Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2025-01-28 06:04 pm
[ SECRET POST #6598 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6598 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 22 secrets from Secret Submission Post #943.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

heard v depp (oh no!)
(Anonymous) 2025-01-29 10:40 am (UTC)(link)Re: heard v depp (oh no!)
(Anonymous) 2025-01-29 01:08 pm (UTC)(link)Re: heard v depp (oh no!)
(Anonymous) 2025-01-29 01:20 pm (UTC)(link)Having been in an abusive relationship, I can honestly say sometimes you say and do things you aren't proud of (though you may be in the moment) because you're fed up with the abuser's treatment of you, and so far you haven't been allowed to express your anger safely or react in any way that any normal person would have in response to abuse. Does it excuse what you did? No. Does it make you a bad person? Based on that alone, no, it doesn't.
And honestly, if the defense of Depp is that "well, she was just as bad as HE was" then I don't think that's a very good defense of him.
It's kind of like when a bully says something horribly nasty to you in school where nobody can hear, and deliberately walks away before you can respond. And you chase after the bully yelling at them, maybe calling them names because they called you a name. But what does the public see? You being a bastard to the poor bully. Hell, the tactic is so common, you might have seen it play out in a cartoon.
Like I said, I haven't been following the case. This is just a perspective to consider.
Re: heard v depp (oh no!)
(Anonymous) 2025-01-29 01:48 pm (UTC)(link)Re: heard v depp (oh no!)
(Anonymous) 2025-01-29 02:36 pm (UTC)(link)"Both sides are bad so it doesn't matter" and "both sides are bad so we should condemn them both" are very different proposals and people don't check which one others mean.
Re: heard v depp (oh no!)
(Anonymous) 2025-01-29 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)The BIGGEST indicator to me is that fact that these recordings exist in the first place. Apparently, their therapist told them to record their conversations because Heard was gaslighting Depp so hard that they needed an objective version of reality to rely on. There's one point I remember when Heard says something and Depp response with, "Go listen to the recordings, that's what they're there for." What abuser wants a victim to have an objective view of reality?