Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2025-03-01 03:46 pm
[ SECRET POST #6630 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6630 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

[Cardcaptor Sakura]
__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 81 secrets from Secret Submission Post #948.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-03-02 12:07 am (UTC)(link)Was it "understandable" for us to create internment camps for Japanese and German Americans because we were at war with their countries? Was it okay for us to indiscriminately kill their civilians, most of whom had no say in what their militaries and governments were doing?
Look, I'm not gonna beat around the bush with this. This attitude you have is exactly what leads people to believe that it's perfectly fine to mistreat others simply because of where they had the bad luck to be born, and it's what leads people to believe that it makes sense to level an entire country. And you may say, "but that isn't what I mean," but for goodness' sake, what else could be the logical endpoint of, "guilt by association is sensible on a national scale?"
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-03-02 12:13 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-03-02 12:31 am (UTC)(link)Economic punishment is punishment. It always affects the most vulnerable in a population, while the people it's meant to affect go unscathed. In fact, the powerful tend to use it as an excuse to redistribute more wealth up to themselves.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-03-02 01:18 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-03-02 02:04 am (UTC)(link)But I assume you know that the majority of this comm does not consider economic concerns to be of primary importance in political matters.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-03-02 02:29 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-03-02 12:20 am (UTC)(link)(/s because apparently this anon actually does believe that)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-03-02 12:27 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-03-02 12:37 am (UTC)(link)Because that is what you're objecting to: other countries boycotting us. It's the exact same situation. You're just objecting to diction, which is the last ditch of the losing side. No country has any obligation to buy our goods. Period.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-03-02 12:51 am (UTC)(link)No, it is not "just diction." There is an actual tangible difference between a worker in a company and a civilian in a country, and you pretending that there is no difference doesn't make you the "winning side." Leaving a company is a relatively simple matter; leaving a country is not in the best of times, but especially not in a period of near global anti-immigrant sentiment.
And I think the fact that boycotts are viewed as the only manner in which people can express their disapproval of the actions of the powerful is both a capitulation to the logic of capitalism and an argument against globalization more broadly. But those are bigger, more difficult problems that most people would rather not deal with. And in the meantime, ordinary folks suffer from the effects of these actions while the powerful, the people actually responsible for all of this crap in the first place, go completely unscathed! The argument is that "life's not fair," but this goes beyond the unfairness of collateral damage, because the damage isn't collateral at all. It's completely soaked up by the people who least deserve it, and dodged by those at whom it's aimed.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-03-02 01:16 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-03-02 02:11 am (UTC)(link)2014 called and wants its standard flouncy reply back.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-03-02 01:09 am (UTC)(link)