case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-03-20 05:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #6649 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6649 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Paapa Essiedu as Professor Snape, new Harry Potter series]



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[The Magic Schoolbus]



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #950.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: thank you secret maker!

(Anonymous) 2025-03-21 12:01 am (UTC)(link)
See, ^this would make a perfectly phrased secret. Much better than "oh no he's hot"

Re: thank you secret maker!

(Anonymous) 2025-03-21 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
Nah.

Re: thank you secret maker!

(Anonymous) 2025-03-21 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
Agreed!

Re: thank you secret maker!

(Anonymous) 2025-03-21 12:35 pm (UTC)(link)
No one's cared about how secrets are phrased these last few years. Like, that rule (about specifically phrasing it as a secret or it gets pushed to the non-secrets section) stopped applying when the daily secrets dropped below the double digits. Annoying but I guess the place would otherwise be dead.

Re: thank you secret maker!

(Anonymous) 2025-03-21 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Agreed but honestly I had no problem understanding what OP meant. I thought the first commenter misinterpreted it and then everyone else just followed suit.