Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2025-04-01 05:13 pm
[ SECRET POST #6661 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6661 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

[Sonic the Hedgehog]
__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #951.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-04-01 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-04-01 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-04-01 10:17 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-04-01 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-04-01 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-04-02 10:50 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-04-02 12:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-04-02 01:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-04-02 07:18 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-04-02 12:38 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-04-02 01:50 am (UTC)(link)no subject
A) …was actively looking for something disliked and… found it (outrage!). Well, I didn’t like Wotch either — and not watching it was no trouble whatsoever for years. Or
B) …was rummaging fanfics and ran into it. Was the rest of fiction in the same place also «for smut/fetish purposes» or not? If not, the very presence of untagged smut in non-smut section would be a solid cause for complaints (maybe with “and it’s FOO again!” on top, why not). Instead there’s only “I don’t like FOO, and it smells of thoughtcrime and also smut”. If it was in a smut zone, well… having fits of moral indignation while looking for smut looks quite ridiculous — regardless of merits such complaints may or may not have on their own. And that’s how Tumblr earned its place as an addition to the classic «Hell, or Hadleyburg (try and make it the former!)».
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-04-02 10:12 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-04-02 02:51 pm (UTC)(link)That said it's okay if you like it, just don't try to force it on me.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-04-02 23:27 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2025-04-02 02:48 pm (UTC)(link)If you like rule 63/GB/Smut , do you do you, I don't want to have it banned, but it's just not for me and it's not for moral reasons.
I read The Witch because a friend recommended it to me. I stumbled upon Ian C Samson's older stuff while on tvtropes. I wasn't actively looking for smut (not a fan of smut/fetish stuff).
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-04-02 04:41 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-04-02 02:36 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-04-02 12:50 pm (UTC)(link)"I dislike this kink so I dislike fiction featuring this kink" makes sense to me, or "I dislike this ostensibly non-sexual (but actually very commonly sexual) element because I dislike kink/sexual elements in fiction in general" also makes sense to me, but "I dislike fiction featuring this ostensibly non-sexual (but actually very commonly sexual) element because it's usually sexual for people" is a very strange reason for disliking something to me.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-04-02 02:41 pm (UTC)(link)nayrt
(Anonymous) - 2025-04-02 22:42 (UTC) - Expandno subject