[ SECRET POST #6667 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6667 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 29 secrets from Secret Submission Post #952.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Ugh

[(Anonymous)]

Have you actually read anything about the ruling, or are you just trusting philstar's take on things?

They ruled unanimously that migrants must be allowed to challenge their deportations in court before they can be deported. They ruled in favor of due process, not against it.

And their incentive, believe it or not, is that they are actually experts in Constitutional law, unlike you, and try to follow it. You can disagree with their rulings, but frankly I'm sick of people on both the left and the right freaking out and claiming judges are bought or are rogue or are activists whenever they make a ruling that they don't like. Has it occurred to you that maybe, just maybe, the fact that they piss off both sides of the aisle means they might be a tad less ideological than you think they are? Could it be that you view their rulings through your personal ideology, rather than through any cogent understanding of this part of the law?