case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-05-03 02:09 pm

[ SECRET POST #6693 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6693 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 64 secrets from Secret Submission Post #957..
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2025-05-04 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)
ignore them. A loud minority on fs don't know the meaning of words and how to regulate their emotions. You're speaking to shaking, drunk retards.
Also it's your right to complain about politics in general thread and secrets. Don't let the shaking druggies intimidate you.

(Anonymous) 2025-05-04 10:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm well aware. Especially since at the end of my post, I wrote:

"So I dropped it. Weird how I learned to get over inevitably seeing politics but not other nonnies."

Those anons can literally just close their eyes, colapse the thread, or try out that Dreamwidth Blocker browser addon instead of throwing a fit like they did on this post. It's just the whiplash of how when I did this months before they did, I was the crazy one, and now others with my pervious opinion are being listened to.

(Anonymous) 2025-05-05 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
Hmm I thought most disagreed with the anti Phil anon. I didn't read too deeply into those two threads so no opinion here. As long as that anon doesn't stalk a named user they're fine ig.

My point is that you don't have to reframe your view to fit some anons here.