case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-05-22 06:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #6712 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6712 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
(pastry chef, Food Network star)



__________________________________________________



04.
[Ouran High School Host Club]



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
[Sonic The hedgehog]



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #959..
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2025-05-22 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
And if that's all it was going to be used for I'd have a lot less objections, but it's looking increasingly like it's going be used to screw over actual human artists (and indeed any number of actual humans whose jobs could potentially be done with AI, like coders)-- and that's not even going into the appalling resource consumption.
paperghost: (Default)

[personal profile] paperghost 2025-05-23 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
It already has. I try to be nuanced about how casual/hobby AI use isn't the enemy when it's the corporations introducing it onto sites without user permission or firing human workers in favor of it, but the amount of energy it uses makes it not worth it to me.

(Anonymous) 2025-05-23 02:55 am (UTC)(link)
Jobs have always shifted as new technology has been introduced. You're currently benefiting from tons of tech that supplanted previous tech, and shedding zero tears for the people whose livelihoods faded away as a result.

I am concerned about how so-called AI's energy requirements. But I don't think it's going to kill human art, and I find it hard to be sympathetic to the "job killing" narrative, because jobs are always being killed as our wants and needs and capacities change, and the only time anyone cares is when it's affecting them personally. Well, if your job is going away, perhaps you should adapt, like everyone else before you has had to do. You don't go to a cobbler to fix your shoes, and you also don't weep for all the poor cobblers who've gone out of business.

(Anonymous) 2025-05-23 04:20 am (UTC)(link)
I do go to a cobbler to fix my shoes! But I don't go to a cobbler to buy them, because that's too expensive (and always was relatively expensive).

People are firing artists and writers in favour of AI but it's incredibly dumb because the AI product is considerably and noticeably worse. The energy requirements are bad, the stealing of copyright material and pretending that it's okay is bad, the insistence that AI is intelligent when it's just a sophisticated autocorrect is bad. I agree about the job killing, though, and I think it's going to end up with AI generated human supervised art.