case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-06-14 04:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #6735 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6735 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.
[The Blacklist]



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 50 secrets from Secret Submission Post #964.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2025-06-14 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Change is achieved through a blend and variety of matters and actions, of which violence is a sad and undeniable part of the mix. The more firmly entrenched the thing you are seeking to change, they greater the chance that violence will have to be involved at some point. You can have all the polite protests you want, but if the thing you need to change is the thing the other party adamantly wants not to be changed or, worse, is ideologically opposed to that change, then violence will be essential at some point. That point has to be carefully chosen and focused, and the violence must stop once the other party is prepared to come, in good faith, to the negotiating table.

This is complicated.

(Anonymous) 2025-06-15 01:42 am (UTC)(link)
Two things are true:

1. Change will inevitably require violence at some point.

2. The part almost nobody knows or cares about: the violence must be very, very carefully strategized. Doing random violence to "bring attention to the cause" or even the slightly smarter attacking people on the side you're against when nobody's looking aren't going to do anything. You need the perfect window of opportunity to maximize the effect, minimize the damage, and get people to sympathize with your cause. Nobody screaming on the internet that violence is the answer and pacifism is fascist wants to believe this. They've just come to love violence and hate everyone.