Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2025-06-16 04:01 pm
[ SECRET POST #6737 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6737 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #964.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-06-16 09:16 pm (UTC)(link)A review given for profit should be held to a particular standard. A 'review' on a personal blog, for the interest of the poster's own friends can say whatever the hell it wants, and there should be no expectation that they'd know which features are or are not available on which settings.
Again: one is played for enjoyment, and shared for the same reason, while the other is played and shared for profit.
To judge people who enjoyed a game and posted a personal review, for their own enjoyment and that of their friends, by the same standards you'd judge someone paid to review games professionally (i.e., expecting them to have played on every difficulty and know the fundamental ins-and-outs of what options are and are not available on which difficulties) is ridiculous.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-06-16 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)What you somehow read: I judge every casual review exactly the same and with exactly the same standards as I judge all professional reviews
I don't know how we got here, but here we are.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-06-17 12:25 pm (UTC)(link)