case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-06-16 04:01 pm

[ SECRET POST #6737 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6737 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #964.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2025-06-17 01:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, reviewers should include all that information as a part of their review. I would like to know what difficulty (or difficulties) they played on, the platform, a general overview of their hardware, how long they played, how much of the game they completed, etc.

When someone reviews a new movie you take it as default that they saw it in a theater. But we don't have that with video games. Someone who reviews a film after watching it on their phone while commuting on the train is going to have a different experience than someone second-screening it at a beautiful home theater. And that shit kind of matters.