[ SECRET POST #6741 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6741 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Casino Royale]



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of cheating/abuse/abusive marriages]




__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of abuse]


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #964.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Hmm this is interesting. I don't feel like I see people bring up trans men (or nonbinary people who were afab, like me) in relation to forcefem kink very much. The connection feels pretty obvious since like, the irl men who are forced to be "women"/feminine the most, are trans men. And obviously it's wrong when it's non-consensual like that, but it's fine when it's fictional or between consenting adults, you have nothing to feel bad about.

But I think the way forcefem kink and transphobic forced feminization tend to look are very different. I HAVE seen trans men online with like, "transphobic abuse" kinks, which makes me dysphoric and uncomfortable. (Still not saying it's immoral, just euughh.) But forcefem the way it's generally done with cis men doesn't bother me at all, unless it's based on the idea that being feminine/a woman is INHERENTLY degrading/bad but that's a different issue. Maybe tmi but personally, if anything, being "forced" to wear a skirt in a way that frames it as gender nonconforming feels affirming to me? IDK.