[ SECRET POST #6741 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6741 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Casino Royale]



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of cheating/abuse/abusive marriages]




__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of abuse]


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #964.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

..... Nah man. That makes no goddamned sense.

[(Anonymous)]

What part do you not understand

[(Anonymous)]

The part where you think a slash fic with the pairing tagged is "untagged dickboy fetish" as if a man having a dick, i.e. one of the two most common configurations, was a fetish. You remind me of the guy who claimed that people needed to tag queer characters and got all offended when I said the pairing WAS the tag.

Character is canonically a trans man? Great, tagging the character is fine. Character is not canonically a trans man? Tagging the character is fine, i.e. you don't need to tag "dickboy." The default is the canon. Just tag your shit when you're deviating and get over yourself.

[(Anonymous)]

That was (mostly) a joke. My point was just that if being attracted to less common body types is considered a fetish, being attracted to more common ones should be too. I don't actually think either should be though.

I do think universally tagging the genitals in addition to gender of characters involved in smut (or the equivalent of "choose not to warn") would solve a lot of problems though. Everyone can search for what they want more easily, avoid what they don't want, can't claim it's transphobic to just require it for trans characters/assume everyone is cis when unspecified, etc.

[(Anonymous)]

Nah, that's entirely superfluous.