[ SECRET POST #6753 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6753 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[Donkey Kong Bananza]



__________________________________________________



06.




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 13 secrets from Secret Submission Post #965.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Diddy verdict

[(Anonymous)]

You know, I had assumed that was a strategy rather than they truly thought he could be convicted on racketeering. Because for the racketeering, it seemed like they would be allowed to show patterns and connect everything which is maybe not something a judge would grant them the latitude to do if that wasn't one of the charges. I don't know if that's true or not, and I do think they would be perfectly happy if they could have convicted him on it. I mean, to me, it felt like more of a catch-all kind of charge than anything else.