[ SECRET POST #6753 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6753 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[Donkey Kong Bananza]



__________________________________________________



06.




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 13 secrets from Secret Submission Post #965.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Diddy verdict

[(Anonymous)]

I think they got lazy. They saw that public sentiment was against Diddy and figured they could play to the jury's emotions and get the conviction based on "look what a bad guy he is -- how could he not be guilty?" And to be fair, that works a lot of the time. But other times, the jury actually understands what "proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt" means and acts accordingly.

Re: Diddy verdict

[(Anonymous)]

which is why I'm not blaming the jurors in this case even if the evidence still points to him. if jurors had reasonable doubt and the state couldn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt can I blame the jurors the conclusion that they reached? (answer: no) even though some of the evidence I heard in the news was really hard to hear.