Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2025-07-08 08:05 pm
[ SECRET POST #6759 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6759 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[NANA]
__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 18 secrets from Secret Submission Post #965.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-07-09 07:31 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Shit, F!S about to get real fucking quiet!
And since we're back on blood liable thing, I would like to reiterate: I said - and in fact stand by this belief - that saying a gentile politician or celebrity is addicted to adrenochrome is NOT antisemitic. You tell me the thing started with people calling the jews drinkers of childrens blood? Ok. but lots of people said lots of shit about the jews, "The Rothschilds control the weather" for example. That does not mean a joke about how, idk, the Saudis caused the cricket to be rained out using their weather control tech is also anti-semitic. (I might be misremembering who had the cloud seeding, but you take the point.) Just because it was an accusation aimed at the jews does not mean that anytime you say it about anyone else ever in the future it BECOMES anti-semitic.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-07-09 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)https://www.forbes.com/sites/conormurray/2023/07/15/the-adrenochrome-conspiracy-theory-pushed-by-sound-of-freedom-star-explained/
You bought into the blood libel and keep saying it's not but it literally is. It's just the repackaged "Jews are killing non-Jew kids in blood rituals." You cannot be this stupid.
no subject
It's difficult to make "don't be an asshole or have asshole opinions" a rule on FS without bringing up a huge debate about what exactly "being an asshole" entails and sweeping a whole bunch of other people into it, as many anons have frequently insulted and openly talked down to others too, just hidden behind anonymity. (Politics threads get pretty wild...)
If you think things that thewakokid has said or done has broken DW's TOS, you can report them yourself here: https://www.dreamwidth.org/support/ (I'll happily defer to their judgement.)
no subject
Well, I's been... interesting being a named user. If I get the chop I'll just have to go anon (or not. I like the idea of anytime anyone posts anything this person disagrees with they'll start on their wild imaginings. They'll never know if it's me or not! Please if they nix me, do me a favour and don't tell them if it's me or not unless I actually do break the rules, Just tell them "No" every time. Even when it's not me.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-07-09 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
But I agreed not to make those jokes on F!S because case disagrees. Just because Case will rule it as antisemitism if I do adrenochrome jokes, and just because I respect that's his ruling does not mean I have to change my mind about it being antisemitic.