case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-07-09 04:29 pm

[ SECRET POST #6760 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6760 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 12 secrets from Secret Submission Post #965.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2025-07-09 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Why?

(Anonymous) 2025-07-09 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Because the shows would suffer for it. Any drama in a show would be undermined by silliness. Any writers, show runners, producers, and studio executives would have no say over a part of their show. And I don’t think audiences would enjoy on a wide scale. Sure OP will enjoy it but one viewer doesn’t make an audience for multimillion dollar productions. In markets with a majority of viewers watching in terrestrial services, advertisers will lose revenue for the final commercial break and the one immediately following the show. It would be stupid and pointless but more importantly the shows would suffer for it, which is the exact opposite of what OP said.

(Anonymous) 2025-07-09 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)
DA - but this is wildly personal opinion, so I don't know why you're assuming majority audiences agree with you and not OP. Some people would hate it, some people would love it, there is no real right or wrong here.

(Anonymous) 2025-07-09 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
So maybe an alternative is to not require it for every show?

(Anonymous) 2025-07-09 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow, you are taking this so seriously.

(Anonymous) 2025-07-09 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
No, just pointed out the obvious stupidity of the secret after two people failed to understand the first comment.

(Anonymous) 2025-07-09 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Sir, this is a Wendy's.

(Anonymous) 2025-07-10 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
Nah, this is a Maccy’s. You can always tell when it’s a secret by that middle aged, white, presumably middle class bitch who misses 70s British TV. Apparently there just isn’t enough racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or classism on the telly these days. Pointing out her stupidity is fun for me.

(Anonymous) 2025-07-10 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
You sound mean.

(Anonymous) 2025-07-10 02:31 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah I probably do which is funny because I’m usually very kind. It’s just this one OP that I can’t stand and wish they’d fuck off.

(Anonymous) 2025-07-10 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
It's amazing how you are able to assess OP's entire existence and life based on one harmless secret and conclude they are not only a horrible person, but a particular type of horrible person.

(Anonymous) 2025-07-10 03:32 am (UTC)(link)
DA

Says more about them than the secret says about OP for sure.

(Anonymous) 2025-07-10 04:34 am (UTC)(link)
Why don't you fuck off instead?

(Anonymous) 2025-07-10 05:26 am (UTC)(link)
I'll have to take your word re: the kindness, because this level of vitriol over a Benny Hill secret feels... honestly, a touch psycho. Not trying to be snarky here, you just seem excessively overheated about a secret that seems geared towards giving people a giggle.
nanslice: (Default)

[personal profile] nanslice 2025-07-10 03:02 am (UTC)(link)
How did you get all that from this secret?

(Anonymous) 2025-07-10 04:36 am (UTC)(link)
Lol you have issues.

(Anonymous) 2025-07-10 11:23 am (UTC)(link)
woah, you're a racist.

(Anonymous) 2025-07-10 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
This comment is giving Mary Bennett.
paperghost: (Default)

[personal profile] paperghost 2025-07-10 02:28 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that's the point OP is making...