case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-07-13 02:10 pm

[ SECRET POST #6764 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6764 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 37 secrets from Secret Submission Post #968.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2025-07-14 01:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Nayrt but are you seriously this naiive that you believe only the words "I want you dead" count as wanting people dead? And the systematic dismantling of any and all support for certain groups of people (be it trans, disabled or other) that ensure/support their survival and the intentional rejection of their very existence somehow ... doesn't really count because they didn't use the literal words "I want you to die".
thewakokid: (Default)

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] thewakokid 2025-07-14 02:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not the one that set the standard of "the people loudly screaming for your death".

If that they meant was "The people I believe want me dead" I would have had quite a different direction to go.

They wanted to claim a lack of ambiguity, so thats the standard.

As to the other stuff, there ARE other reasons to dismantle a system than the desire to see he beneficiaries of the system dead. Even IF you believe that is the inevitable outcome, you still have to acknowledge that might simply be an undesired but unavoidable by product.

Like, ok- Make any right winger this offer "Either we get rid of medicaid completely, or we keep it for everything except trans stuff. And abortions, No more abortions. In fact let me sweeten the pot! Actual funding within medicaid to encourage and assist DEtransitioning. And free MAID for any trans person who wants it. Total trans death, just like you want."

Now, tell me how much you have a finger on the pulse of the average right wing maga chud, tell me, do you think they take the offer?
Edited 2025-07-14 14:12 (UTC)

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2025-07-14 02:58 pm (UTC)(link)
The MAGA person would go with the option they think makes the libs cry more, even if they hurt themselves in the process. And if their guy can look like a hero on top of that, that's just a bonus.

In this case, they'd definitely choose the one that puts the wimmenz in their place and takes steps toward erasing trans people. That way, they can feel like big boys and big girls who think their internalized misogyny makes them one of the boys (spoiler: it doesn't).
thewakokid: (Default)

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] thewakokid 2025-07-14 03:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Uh huh. Well, good to know we're all mentally sound and in touch with reality here. No mad men here, nosiree.
thewakokid: (Default)

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] thewakokid 2025-07-14 03:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Ok, you know what, the sarcasm was inkind and unhelpful, I apologise. But really, you would benefit by talking to !ore right wingers.

Not snarky centrists like me, not internet trolls, not people already in a fight with you and looking to score points, or people whom you want to score points with...

And if you ever get the opportunity, try to resist the urge to correct them or try to fix them - instead try to work on replicating their internal logic, on understanding them, on finding out not what piece of info they are lacking that makes them inferior to you but on what series of priorities and values led them to their point of view.

I realise I'm telling you "You will be better served by working on understanding and emulating their internal map when your not in an argument" WHILE you and I are in an argument. Specifically after I'd just insulted you. I recognise you've no reason to see this as anything other than a tactic... But its good advice all the same I think. Consider it later. Tomorrow maybe. Day after.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2025-07-14 04:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Nah. I know how they work, no need to wakosplain to me.

And forgot to clarify, I and ayrt are a different anon.