case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-09-03 06:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #6816 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6816 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.
[Tomba/Tombi!]



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 13 secrets from Secret Submission Post #973.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2025-09-04 01:03 am (UTC)(link)
You can say the 90s but that "tribal" enemy aesthetic is still around in video games today. Look at the most recent Legend of Zelda games, for instance - the enemies wear animal skins and use bone weapons.

(Anonymous) 2025-09-04 04:08 am (UTC)(link)
That can just as well be "stone age people" tribal though.

(Anonymous) 2025-09-04 07:08 am (UTC)(link)
In some games they have dreadlocks!

(Anonymous) 2025-09-04 08:13 am (UTC)(link)
Sure, do you think stone age people didn't have that? Pretty sure that's what they get depicted like a lot.
I'm not saying it isn't potentially racist (Japanese games/anime do have some well known issues with the depiction of black people/foreigners in general) but with tribal people in video games, you can often make just as much as a case for "that's primitive stone-age stuff" as "that's a racist tribal caricature".

(Anonymous) 2025-09-04 03:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Do they have big cartoonish lips and stereotypical "ooga booga" clothing though? Come on. It's not the trope or the aesthetic itself, it's the execution.