case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-09-21 02:54 pm

[ SECRET POST #6834 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6834 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
[Rayman]



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 46 secrets from Secret Submission Post #976.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2025-09-22 02:13 am (UTC)(link)
Sort of, anon that anon is replying to is starting with Stance 1 though: https://fandomsecrets.dreamwidth.org/3279127.html?thread=1146168855#cmt1146168855

"My problem is the same with any kink that incorporates the general public. It’s a violation..." implies that furry is always kink, which the other anon is replying to with the anti-trans rhetoric comment.

But anyway, that's why it's a mess, this thread is half people who insist furry = kink and others that don't agree.
paperghost: (Default)

[personal profile] paperghost 2025-09-22 02:22 am (UTC)(link)
I read the thread, the whole thing is a mess overall. I even commented that most of the replies missed the point of the OP's secret. I know most commenters on here are anon so I take this bullshit with a grain of salt, but it always drives me crazy when I see people parrot Republican talking points, but it's different if they frame it positively. ~I Guess~

(Anonymous) 2025-09-22 05:12 am (UTC)(link)
No it doesn't actually imply this, the TERF whining anon WANTS it to imply this so they can get huffy about it. What is said is that people who do involve others in their kink against their will suck, and the thing this implies is that they include people in their kink at that point, not that eveyrthing they do is part of their kink.