case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-10-04 02:32 pm

[ SECRET POST #6847 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6847 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[Reading Rainbow (the reboot) with Mychal Threets]



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
[Devil May Cry anime]



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 47 secrets from Secret Submission Post #978.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Question for gay/bi/pan Fandom Secreters, Re: secret 7

(Anonymous) 2025-10-05 05:06 am (UTC)(link)
I can't recall any examples off the top of my head, but I think it'd be difficult to put all the blame on the actor for that even if this scenario happened? Like someone else is directing them, someone else wrote the script, there were more hands in creating this non-believable character than the actor portraying them.

This also applies in reverse for queer actors. Some director looked at their takes and decided that was good enough, so it went through.

If someone on their own comes in with outside knowledge that the actor in question is strictly gay or strictly lesbian and they can't suspend their own disbelief, or vice versa, that's a different thing and on their end.