Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2025-10-21 05:38 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2025-10-21 05:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #6864 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6864 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
__________________________________________________
03.
__________________________________________________
04.
__________________________________________________
05.
__________________________________________________
06.
[American Girl dolls]
__________________________________________________
07.
__________________________________________________
08.
[Acotar/ Crescent City/Sarah J Maas]
__________________________________________________
09.
__________________________________________________
10.
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #980.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
It also makes no logical sense like... how on earth does reading something fictional privately cause a person to be abused?????
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-10-22 03:05 am (UTC)(link)Something something, you're giving the content page views and thus enabling more of it to be made. And it theoretically might be used to groom. Or an abuser might see it and compell them to act out more. This was their logic.
Never mind the fact I was interested in stories that mirrored my own abuse, written by other abuse survivors.
no subject
Its basically the mindset of pro-book banning people. They don't care what context something is mentioned in. They just hate that it's mentioned AT ALL.
Because yes, surely reading Go Ask Alice is going to make ~impressionable teenagers~ go out and smoke crack.