case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-10-24 04:49 pm

[ SECRET POST #6867 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6867 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
[Youtube, Dark Asia with Megan]



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.
[His Dark Materials]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Starfleet Academy]




__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for discussion of non-con]




__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for discussion of sexual abuse, CSA, pedophilia]


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #980.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Transcript by OP

[personal profile] fscom 2025-10-24 08:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Deep Space 9 is so good at deconstructing Star Trek, that it, with the episode Valiant, successfully deconstructed the entire premise of the JJ reboot a whole decade before that movie was even made. Mind you, Futurama managed to deconstruct a key point from Into Darkness with its ep Deep South too... so maybe The JJ-Trek just wasn't built very well to start with.

(Anonymous) 2025-10-24 09:34 pm (UTC)(link)
JJ-Trek (gag) wasn't even Star Trek.

(Anonymous) 2025-10-25 02:54 am (UTC)(link)
It sounds like you are saying that if something can be deconstructed then it is not well put together. I feel like many great and not-so-great works have been deconstructed. If you don't like it, that's fine. If you don't think it's good, that's fine too, but deconstructability doesn't seem to me like it would work as a litmus test for well-made.

(Anonymous) 2025-10-25 09:52 am (UTC)(link)
Was the Kelvin-verse deconstructed, or did it just collapse on its own?