case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-10-29 07:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #6872 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6872 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.






















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #981.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2025-10-30 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
How much of "audiences don't sympathize with ugly characters" is tied up with "the media hardly ever portrays ugly characters as sympathetic, or as main protagonists"?

The audience hardly ever gets the chance.

(Anonymous) 2025-10-30 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
Fair point
feotakahari: (Default)

[personal profile] feotakahari 2025-10-30 02:55 am (UTC)(link)
And in animation, you can use your art style to show a character as cute while still making it clear they'd be ugly in a more realistic style. Like Disney's Quasimodo.

(Anonymous) 2025-10-30 05:57 am (UTC)(link)
This. I'm currently rereading the Dressrosa arc in One Piece and Senior Pink is a fairly beloved character despite looking like he does (or rather because he looks like that). Bon Clay isn't winning any beauty awards either but he's unanimously regarded as one of the best and most beloved characters in the story.

Both of them have great story lines. The audience can love unattractive characters as long as the author puts the same care into them as they do in their attractive characters.