case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-10-31 06:33 pm

[ SECRET POST #6874 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6874 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.
[Clockwise from left: Gong Jun, Chang Huasen, Li Daikun]




__________________________________________________



02.
[The Last Sovereign]



__________________________________________________





























03. [SPOILERS for True Fear: Forsaken Souls 3, and for The Dark Pictures Anthology: Little Hope]




__________________________________________________



04. [WARNING for discussion of noncon]




__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for discussion of CSA]




__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of pedophilia]




__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of incest, loli/shota, noncon/dubcon and abuse]





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #981.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: nayrt

(Anonymous) 2025-11-01 06:03 am (UTC)(link)
Not to be rude but I think you need to keep working on the internalized misogyny you keep accusing other people of.

You determined that "all of FS is women only" because people were discussing whether or not they want to have a baby.
Uhh...men also think about whether or not they want to become parents. Same with nonbinary people.

You assumed that other FSers don't consider nonbinary people as femmes based off.....????? No direct quote, no actual posts anywhere that explicitly states this nor any that imply such a thing.
To me, it comes off as a defense you want to use to paint those who don't agree with you as terrible people.

Also, bold of you to assume that anyone who identifies as nonbinary here means that they're AFAB. Even if that is true (which I don't think is), YOU are the internally misogynistic one for labeling nonbinaries essentially as female. Some may, but others might not. From my understanding (please correct me if I'm wrong), some nonbinary people don't mind participating in numbers games "file me under my assigned gender at birth but recognize I'm still nonbinary", but most would rather be categorized as nonbinary. Not "Male", not "Female". List them as "Nonbinary".
Failure to do so is denying nonbinaries of their anatomy.