[ SECRET POST #6894 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6894 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.
[House MD]



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 06 secrets from Secret Submission Post #984.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Yeah I was gonna say, "it's always the daughter" is only true to a certain extent. When you hit a certain social class, the family office and/or trust is expected to take care of everyone, and you have people for that. That's how you get rich heirs/heiresses that are like 45 and adult children being bailed out by daddy still

[(Anonymous)]

This. I'm not sure many people realize it. I'm not rich myself, but I've gone to school with people who grew up with money and it's totally possible for them to be in their 20s, 30s or god help them, older and not know how to do very basic things simply because they always had someone to do it for them. That's the privilege of wealth.

This is not to say that the oldest daughters couldn't be burdened with the societal expectation of caretaking and looking after everyone. But IME, the people who would be doing the lion's share of this burden imposement are parents/family, and if you grow up with wealth, you already have people doing a lot of that for you: childcare, housekeeping, managing finances, juggling appointments, etc. That burden has already been outsourced to someone else. People who don't come from money don't have that benefit, so yes, the weight of societal expectation is a lot heavier.