case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-12-19 05:34 pm

[ SECRET POST #6923 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6923 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Legion (FX)]



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________















08. [SPOILERS for Legion (FX) seasons 2&3]




__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Pillion (2025)]




__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for discussion of child molestation]




__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for discussion of suicide]




__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for discussion of Harvey Weinstein, rape/sexual assault]


























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #988.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2025-12-19 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I think the main reason people dismiss it is because we know for a fact that the accusers were lying.

(Anonymous) 2025-12-19 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
and how do we know that exactly?

he paid them off. you wouldn't pay money if you had nothing to hide.

(Anonymous) 2025-12-19 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Not necessarily. Sometimes people pay money to avoid dragging out a trial for years and years, which can be stressful not just for the client but also their household.

(Anonymous) 2025-12-19 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)
NAYRT

Don't have a horse in this race, but I think it's fair to argue, if they were paid off, then we cannot know "for a fact" that they were lying before they were paid off.

Maybe they were, and the money was just to avoid dragging out a trial. Or maybe they weren’t, and the money bought their compliance. Neither of these things are "known for a fact".

(Anonymous) 2025-12-19 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
…they’ve admitted it though.

(Anonymous) 2025-12-20 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt
plus some of the places described didn't even exist back then and some dates didn't line up.

(Anonymous) 2025-12-20 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
Not to mention the parents accepted the money for a few reasons. First a trial would likely emotionally exhausting for a child. Also that money could pay for therapy. Another possible reason is to avoid harassment. Michael Jackson fans are SCARY. Nuff said

(Anonymous) 2025-12-20 06:52 am (UTC)(link)
Or maybe they were just intending to extort him after trying to (possibly unsuccessfully) whore their children out to a naive and emotionally stunted celebrity.

(Anonymous) 2025-12-20 01:50 pm (UTC)(link)
DA
WTF is wrong with you? Why are you describing someone this way? Why are you dying on this hill?

(Anonymous) 2025-12-20 02:40 pm (UTC)(link)
nayrt
they're right, it's a legit possibility. Would you send your kids to a celebruty? Those parents did.
Something's wrong with you if you don't see that.

(Anonymous) 2025-12-20 03:16 pm (UTC)(link)
You're missing the point. It's unhinged to say shit like "whore their children out" and downplaying a scandal.

Anons on this place are retarded, I swear.

(Anonymous) 2025-12-20 04:38 pm (UTC)(link)
DA
I just love how you think that you hold moral ground while using "retarded" as an insult

(Anonymous) 2025-12-20 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
How do you know that "for a fact?" This feels like trolling.

It's okay to like music by bad people, you know. People aren't black and white. Bad people can be talented.

(Anonymous) 2025-12-20 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
He dangled a baby out a window.

(Anonymous) 2025-12-20 06:53 am (UTC)(link)
Which is totally the same as fucking other kids!

(Anonymous) 2025-12-20 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)
One is abuse and the other is.... abuse.

(Anonymous) 2025-12-20 05:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, both are wrong. However, the original accusation wasn't about dangling a baby out the window.

(Anonymous) 2025-12-20 05:46 pm (UTC)(link)
The accusation was about him behaving inappropriately with children. Many people (gestures at thread) deny it utterly and completely. I am just reminding people that we have him behaving irresponsibly and negligently and inappropriately on camera with a baby. It's not either "He raped all the children" or "He never did anything wrong in his life."

He has absolutely, one hundred percent, undeniably endangered children.