[ SECRET POST #6927 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6927 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.
[Promise Mascot Agency]


__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.
























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 25 secrets from Secret Submission Post #989.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

What are the right reasons?

[(Anonymous)]

Right reasons: bad prose, plotholes, flat characters, deus ex machinae, etc. when these things are actually present in the book.

Wrong reasons: Any of the above claimed to exist when it doesn't. "This was a plothole!" when the reviewer just didn't catch the explanation. "Moral" grievances like "contains bad thing" regardless of context. There was a tweet that sums this kind of thing up with like "People will say a book is bad because it promotes puppy-killing, and then I'll read the book and the puppy-killer is the villain."