[ SECRET POST #6973 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6973 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.




__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #996.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Receipts are fine. I'd say they're essential. Look at it this way - If somebody did do something bad in the past, but they've haven't been doing it since and have in fact been doing their best to make up for it, I'd want to know.

Of course, this depends on a number of factors as well. A dumb kid doing something bad 20 years ago because they didn't know better? I'd probably tell the shamer to fuck off. It would depend on the nature of the offense as well.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah-- a lot depends on the nature of the offense, and the timing! A lot of things are 'dumb kid' offenses, easily forgiven. Many more things are also easily forgiven if they were a one-time thing and never repeated once it was pointed out to the person that they did or said something harmful. But, if someone has a long history of racism, for example, I might be looking for dogwhistles when engaging with their work even if they had been keeping quiet on social media more recently. I could give them the opportunity to show me they've changed, but also keep that awareness that they might *not* have.