[ SECRET POST #6979 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6979 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01. https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/e001afdc9ddf.png
[OP warned for mild NSFW]



__________________________________________________



02.
[WWE, Rey Mysterio and his son Dominik Mysterio]



__________________________________________________



03. [SPOILERS for Fallout]




__________________________________________________



04. [WARNING for discussion of pedophilia, etc]




__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for discussion of sexual assault, transphobia, pedophilia, etc]




__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of sexual assault, transphobia, pedophilia, etc]

[Neil Gaiman/Good Omens/Michael Jackson]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of sexual assault]






















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #996.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Transcript by OP

[fscom]

It annoys me how, wheenever an artist gets outed as being problematic or an abuser there is always a bunch of people who act as if they either never liked the artists work and/or the artists work was always garbage. I saw it when the Neil Gaiman sex assault allegations, JK rowling's transphobia, R Kelly CSA allegations and the Michael Jackson CSA allegatations came out. Just because an artist does something probleamtic doesn't retroactively make a piece of art bad. Just because Gaiman was an alleged sexual abuser, doesn't make Good Omens a bad book. MJ being an alleged pedo doesn't meake "beat it" a bad song.