[ SECRET POST #6982 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6982 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.




__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 25 secrets from Secret Submission Post #997.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Do you have any squicks?

[(Anonymous)]

I meant you could block trans and search for cis, and know for 100% sure that what you find is cis.

Whereas only blocking trans means you still have to guess.

Re: Do you have any squicks?

[(Anonymous)]

It's just not a useful suggestion. No one would use the tag other than the people who already tag things correctly. People would absolutely push back that it's not a mandated tag so they don't have to and you're an asshole for even asking.

Re: Do you have any squicks?

[(Anonymous)]

I mean no one HAS to tag anything and that's been true since forever. Tags are supposed to be both for avoiding things you don't want AND finding things you do want.

I dunno why you're so opposed to it, but okay.

Re: Do you have any squicks?

[(Anonymous)]

I'm neck deep in tagging discourse around other things, and the pushback when you suggest someone tag something that actually is a major trigger (such as graphic child abuse, spousal abuse, etc etc) is insane. Tagging "cis" for canonically cis characters is so mild as to be worthless when you can't even get someone to tag for suicide.

Re: Do you have any squicks?

[(Anonymous)]

Someone who isn't going to tag for suicide isn't going to tag for anything though. Those are lost causes whether it's mild or extreme. But someone who writes both trans fic and cis fic who does tag properly can direct you only to those fics, so you don't have to guess and gamble on untagged ones.

I understand you're against the idea though, so I'm going to shrug and drop it here.

Re: Do you have any squicks?

[(Anonymous)]

DA

It's not correct because this is fanfiction, fic based on established characters, people, and stories. If a character is cis in canon you don't need to tag that /because/ it is already canon. Like I'm the OP for the poc character tag, and it is wrong, imo, to tag a canon character based on the canon colour of their skin. Tagging their canon gender would be similarly strange.

Hell, if I'm reading GTA V fic, I don't expect them to tag for minor violence either. But that's another whole can of worms altogether.