Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2026-02-28 03:27 pm
[ SECRET POST #6994 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6994 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 43 secrets from Secret Submission Post #999.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-03-01 01:44 am (UTC)(link)On the other hand, Stans, by definition, will not abide by the philosophy that we're allowed to like different things.
Some fandoms seem to naturally draws those antis that are basically mirror-verse stans. If you're in one of those fandoms, then you're obviously going to think OP is nuts. On the other hand, stans accuse anyone who isn't a stan of being that kind of hater, so we've got ourselves a bit of a conundrum.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-03-01 01:51 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-03-01 03:12 am (UTC)(link)https://youtu.be/gOMhN-hfMtY
Haters don't have that kind of example. But I'd say it's anyone who dislikes something enough to have a problem with anyone who likes that same thing by default. Not anyone who dislikes any one pairing/headcanon, unless they make it YOUR problem that isn't a hater in my eyes.
Though, I was thinking the same thing, about what constituted a Stan or Hater, since it can vary per fandom more or less, but at the end of the day, even Stans can be haters in their own way. (lol, this is a mess)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-03-01 03:36 am (UTC)(link)