Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2026-03-05 04:18 pm
[ SECRET POST #6999 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6999 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #999.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 04:35 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 04:49 pm (UTC)(link)If your dudes are having sex with their dicks (born or store bought) it's M/M. If one or both are having sex with their vaginas, it's other. Hope that helps. M/M = dick/dick. Very simple equation.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 04:53 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 06:33 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)Anon above says that trans characters who are using vaginas for sex
instead of dicks should be in Other. Not that trans characters are inherently Other. This also doesn't translate to how anyone views trans people in the real world. These are fictional characters, often porn, where someone else's genitals matter to people. God forbid we categorize fiction.
Also, that's not how the world works. Oh, you only agree with a person 80%? Well, you should be arguing for the other side then.
That's not how any of this works.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 07:00 pm (UTC)(link)Literally nobody said this, but starting to see why these conversations never go anywhere. Damn there's so many people being like "literally nobody said that" in this thread
no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 07:01 pm (UTC)(link)They were arguing their own thing, which mostly but not entirely agreed with anon above. So it looks like we're all guilty of that. You included.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 07:06 pm (UTC)(link)This is the comment I was referring to, though it's getting difficult to determine what anon is which now.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 06:49 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 07:04 pm (UTC)(link)Not being on that side doesn't mean you have to support the opposite, just pointing out these are different and taking your stance doesn't necessitate defending theirs.