Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2026-03-06 06:37 pm
[ SECRET POST #7000 ]
⌈ Secret Post #7000 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02. [WARNING for discussion of pedophilia]

__________________________________________________
03. [WARNING for discussion of transphobia]

__________________________________________________
04. [WARNING for discussion of ableism/eugenics]

__________________________________________________
05. [WARNING for discussion of JKR/transphobia]

__________________________________________________
06. [WARNING for discussion of JKR/transphobia]

__________________________________________________
07. [WARNING for discussion of JKR/transphobia]

__________________________________________________
08. [WARNING for discussion of racism, ableism]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #999.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Transcript by OP
no subject
Edit: also want to add that fandom is meant to be a creative outlet, so when you're busy defending yourself over every minimal interaction instead of being creative, it stops being fun.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-03-07 02:14 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-03-07 01:10 am (UTC)(link)People seem to have difficulty understanding neutral remarks and insist that you must have chosen to leave a comment in order to attack them or call them wrong, instead of idk, something neutral like making idle chat, pointing out an observation, or adding more info to what they said. Like they assume every response to them that does NOT begin with an outright positive affirmation like "yes you're so right" must then instead begin with a an automatic, hidden "no, you're wrong" even if nobody said that. As though if you're not replying to take their side, you must then automatically be against them because otherwise why say anything at all?
I wonder if it's because everyone's online now and people forgot how to have normal small talk?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-03-07 06:24 pm (UTC)(link)I have been forced into both chronic online-ness and chronic offline-ness the past 10 years or so. And so I became eerily aware of how a lot of our culture is mediated by online culture now, particularly if you're in your 40s or younger, and that is bad because online culture is fully mediated by the .coms of it all, and now AI which makes it even worse. Our brains are kinda melting for real. And we're allowing it because if you don't know your netiquette you're not cool, not in and should be excluded. I was in fandom in the 90s, 00s. When it was us and private (possibly) conversations over IM, so it was really like a RL conversation, where it was just us and maybe a weird stalking eavesdropper at most and our silly inside jokes. But a conversation over X or even here is less a conversation and more a product where there are interested parties checking our language, cultural references, what makes us tick or buy - in other words, so many of us are losing our abilities to be decently human and the state of the world serves to show this and that's all because we're only, or mostly, interacting online. Well, of course the TV and so on before that, but it's gotten way worse.
Of course, things like exhaustion from overworking and AI mediated psychosis don't help with free thinking and being a full fledged well-developed human either.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-03-07 04:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-03-07 05:06 am (UTC)(link)