case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2026-03-13 07:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #7007 ]


⌈ Secret Post #7007 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.
[Whitney Houston]



__________________________________________________














02. [SPOILERS for season two of The Night Manager]




__________________________________________________



03. [WARNING for discussion of Neil Gaiman, sexual assault/rape]




__________________________________________________



04. [WARNING for discussion of JKR, transphobia]




__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for discussion of rape]

























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #1000.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2026-03-14 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
The worst thing about this discourse is that if the creator glosses over the rape and someone brings it up in the discussion/comments, someone will jump on them to "We don't need to acknowledge that anymore, it's all anyone ever talks about; yall care more about him than everything that happened to the protag because everyone always cares more about the man, you just proved why this movie's existence is so important for feminism." Or worse and more commonly, "It wasn't rape because in a scene before that he said he was attracted to the girl."

(Anonymous) 2026-03-14 04:48 am (UTC)(link)
"It wasn't rape because in a scene before that he said he was attracted to the girl."

I want to rip my skin off every time someone doesn't understand that consent can be redrawn at any time, even during sex.