[ SECRET POST #7012 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #7012 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 15 secrets from Secret Submission Post #1001.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I'm irrationally angry that it's considered nostalgia bait considering I read LOTR before any millennial was even born. If you have to be nostalgic let's go back to the fucking books please.

That said, there's a reason Gollum's info was three paragraphs in the middle of the Council of Elrond - it's not interesting! Aragorn found tracks in the swamp, caught the creature, dragged it to Mirkwood. THE END.

[(Anonymous)]

The movies are 25 years old so they count as being a nostalgic form of media regardless of whether that makes you angry.

But yeah there really isn’t much of any kind of story there, like out of all the bits they didn’t have time to put into the movie trilogy choosing one of the least interesting parts is so odd. Which is why it feels so cashgrabby because Aragon was very popular back then, so it comes off as trying to capitalise on that but without the original actor I don’t see it working out.