Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2026-04-01 05:19 pm
[ SECRET POST #7026 ]
⌈ Secret Post #7026 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 12 secrets from Secret Submission Post #1003.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Non-fandom arguments.
(Anonymous) 2026-04-02 02:43 am (UTC)(link)The second argument was over some fact-based thing. Basically a friend and I are working on a group project and friend says that X thing was a historical fact, and I can point to credible sources that say no, it wasn't. But the friend insists that they did their research and they're sure that X was a fact. I just gave up because... whatever, right? But I'm still stressed about it. It does involve me, I don't want to look like a lazy person who doesn't research stuff! But it's not like it'll make a huge difference in the long run. I just hate it when people aren't sensible.
Re: Non-fandom arguments.
(Anonymous) 2026-04-02 01:39 pm (UTC)(link)(Granted, I know some folks might have an unfortunate living situation with the boundary-crosser. If that's the case, perhaps leave the room or take a walk.)
Working on a group project though? Assuming you're going to present it? I do think the presenters have a huge obligation to be factual (or as factual as possible). Sources ought to be doublechecked and triplechecked. There's enough misinformation in the world.