[ SECRET POST #7028 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #7028 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.




__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________







































04. [WARNING for discussion of rape/sexual assault]




__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for discussion of child sexual abuse]




__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of assault, ableism]




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #1003.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Kind of based on 3

[(Anonymous)]

What silly things break immersion for you when watching or reading something?

Re: Kind of based on 3

[kaijinscendre]

When people don't say hello or goodbye on phones.

Re: Kind of based on 3

[(Anonymous)]

when people hold the phone up to their neck instead of their mouth (old phones, not cells) and phone numbers all starting with 555

Re: Kind of based on 3

[(Anonymous)]

Hard to describe, but I hate it when a scene I'm reading just ends with a someone saying a dramatic cliffhanger sentence (queue duffduffs). Then it picks up with the same characters different day and you *never get any payoff for the cliffhanger*. I keep feeling super cheated. IRL there's no magic zoom in to shocked face: cut to new scene - you have to somehow field responses, leave the room, etc. I get it in soap operas but get *so mad* when it's chaptered narrative. Freaking finish your scenes!

Re: Kind of based on 3

[(Anonymous)]

Not quite breaks immersion but definitely distracts me when they have kids in the fic but no details. Like what age they are, who the parents are, if they do anything and dont mention who is watching the kid while they are off doing stuff, etc.

Obvi not just any kids but I mean when they write in one or both characters being a parent/caregiver/guardian.

Re: Kind of based on 3

[(Anonymous)]

When the wrong type of language is used. If they're characters from any historical era before, like, the 1870s, they should not be using the words "dude" or "totes." Victorian ladies of class would not be referring to moon powers as if they were 70s flower children.

Re: Kind of based on 3

[(Anonymous)]

Anachronisms, like potatoes in mediaeval Europe. Of the latest one, Shakespeare's wife hawking with a Harris hawk. Did the filmmakers not realise that falconry nerds would be interested in the film, but pick up on an American SW hawk being used? It made me giggle, which I presume is not what they were going for.

Re: Kind of based on 3

[(Anonymous)]

phone anon here again. why did the characters in the 1980's version of Duck Tales all have 1920's "candlestick" phones?

Re: Kind of based on 3

[(Anonymous)]

Because Scrooge wouldn't shell out for new phones when the old ones worked just fine?

Re: Kind of based on 3

[(Anonymous)]

Anachronistic names. Unless they're so egregious that I know they weren't going for realism. I can watch Xena and accept a Gabrielle in Ancient Greece because it's Xena. But I can't watch a movie from 2000 set in the modern day with an adult woman named Madison without wanting to scream.

Re: Kind of based on 3

[(Anonymous)]

Canon inconsistencies!

I'll come up with a work around so I can keep going, but "having" to come up with that work around takes me out.