Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2026-04-04 06:07 pm
[ SECRET POST #7029 ]
⌈ Secret Post #7029 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #1004.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-04-05 11:27 am (UTC)(link)Like, yes, Secret OP. I don't think there is anything wrong with how you choose to consume the media you enjoy. There is no reason to have any interest in the creators TBH, like...not really.
But in this unpersonalized approach you probably have a clearer sense of the creator's true intent/passions than what many hardcore fans of the figure do.
I personally enjoy learning about creators of things I really enjoy. I think it came from really enjoying English class, and finding Shakespeare to be just as interesting as the plays he'd written. I can enjoy a piece of media as it is, but if I really like it or didn't like it, it can also be fun to look up the creators of the projects to see what inspired them to create what they did.
TL; DR - idolizing people who work in creative industries is a form of entertainment media of its own; enjoying media made by creatives with no interest in the creators may be a better way in actually enjoying said media; I like humans and I think humans are interesting, please don't interpret that as me idolizing creatives/being into pop culture worship (PS. creativity and humans' relationship to it is interesting too)