case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2009-12-16 09:21 am

(no subject)

Because I'm getting tons of PMs and stuff about this: stuff featuring actual porn of lolicon/shota/whatever will be linked, or was supposed to be just linked, just like every other secret featuring explicit porn. But sometimes I make mistakes and a secret gets by that should have been just linked. If a secret is posted that should be linked or warned for, notify me in the name the fandom thread and I'll fix it as soon as I can.

Unfortunately, secrets about lolicon/shota will not be banned because some people think it's wrong or gross or whatever. Some people think fic about rape or gore is wrong or gross or whatever. Some people think slash is wrong or gross or whatever. I'm sure everyone agrees that actual child porn is a bad thing. Lolicon/shota is not actual child porn.

Once again, I'm sorry for letting #127 get past my radar yesterday, and will try not to let it happen again.

[identity profile] spudjuice.livejournal.com 2009-12-16 07:14 pm (UTC)(link)
If he can take the criticism in good grace and admit it shouldn't have happened, so can you. Suck it up, calm down, and pounce on some of the other people who're pointing this out. It's not like I'm one of the idiots who harassed the guy by PM. I just think the mistake shouldn't have been made and that the image warranted extra caution when posted.

(And for the record, the knowledge the image was there would have made me super-paranoid and cautious about posting it. Apparently, that's just me.)
karel: (Default)

[personal profile] karel 2009-12-16 07:15 pm (UTC)(link)
HAHA nice deflection of any point made! You're pretty funny.

[identity profile] spudjuice.livejournal.com 2009-12-16 07:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Shall I just accept that I'm an entitled douchebag who needs to understand the Internet is a scary place and call it a day? Would that make you happy? 'cause I'm way too lazy for this.

I honestly care far less than you seem to think.

(Anonymous) 2009-12-16 07:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Now anyone making the same points as you via PM are "idiots?" GG.

[identity profile] spudjuice.livejournal.com 2009-12-16 07:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm working on the assumption that several of the PMers are PMing with capslock rage. Given that this is the Internet, that is a very easy assumption to make.

(Anonymous) 2009-12-16 07:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Keep digging and you might hit Russia.

(Anonymous) 2009-12-16 07:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I bet she can see it from her house.

[identity profile] spudjuice.livejournal.com 2009-12-16 08:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Afraid not. It's just very hard to see with all these white knights obstructing my vision.

(Anonymous) 2009-12-16 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)
white knights? no, sorry, we don't expect Case to sleep with us for our "defending" him. he's asexual.

(Anonymous) 2009-12-16 10:30 pm (UTC)(link)
If he can take the criticism in good grace and admit it shouldn't have happened, so can you.

The problem is this is his APOLOGY. You're just beating a dead horse. He was pm'd and ragged at a million times and trust me HE KNOWS ALREADY. I think it's inappropriate and rude to keep harping on the fact that he made a mistake when he's clearly apologizing for it and promising to take more care in the future. Are you right that the secret is triggery/possibly illegal/whatever? Yes, but you're stating all this AFTER THE FACT and you look like a jackass who just can't let go.