case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2009-12-16 09:21 am

(no subject)

Because I'm getting tons of PMs and stuff about this: stuff featuring actual porn of lolicon/shota/whatever will be linked, or was supposed to be just linked, just like every other secret featuring explicit porn. But sometimes I make mistakes and a secret gets by that should have been just linked. If a secret is posted that should be linked or warned for, notify me in the name the fandom thread and I'll fix it as soon as I can.

Unfortunately, secrets about lolicon/shota will not be banned because some people think it's wrong or gross or whatever. Some people think fic about rape or gore is wrong or gross or whatever. Some people think slash is wrong or gross or whatever. I'm sure everyone agrees that actual child porn is a bad thing. Lolicon/shota is not actual child porn.

Once again, I'm sorry for letting #127 get past my radar yesterday, and will try not to let it happen again.

[identity profile] spudjuice.livejournal.com 2009-12-20 01:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Not quite! More like... if you run and slip on a wet floor, I might well be sympathetic and help you up. If you run and slip on a wet floor when there was a sign telling you it was wet, I'd still help you up and all but it was pretty damn stupid of you. Your version is also pretty relevant, though.

And ack! I don't know much about Australian Internet whatsits beyond the fact loli/shota is considered to be just as serious as any child pornography to the point of including the notably unrealistic Simpsons characters (which the guy quite possibly had for the purpose of making people go "MY CHILDHOOD IS RUINED") but that right there is a scary idea.