[ SECRET POST #7100 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #7100 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.




__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.


























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 25 secrets from Secret Submission Post #1014.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[case]

Name the fandom. And repeats, etc.

(If you think something in this thread is a troll, please ignore it! Conversation is fine, but OT wank makes stuff harder to keep track of in this thread. Thanks.)

(frozen comment)

[fscom]

DAILY LINKS:

General comments → Off-topic discussion thread

Games thread → Thread for games/memes/etc.

[fscom]

01. https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/7cb9736bcf5f.png

Transcript by OP

[fscom]

I don't know how to explain that one of the best fictional story lines I've ever seen was a series of wrestling matches.

[fscom]

02. https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/2683678d0ba1.png

Transcript by OP

[fscom]

I never have and will never agree that Johnlock was queerbait.

Because the creators of the show kept telling people over and over and over again that it wasn’t going to happen and they weren’t going to fall in love. Shocker: they didn’t.

Actual queerbait would have been them going ‘well idk what will happen, tee hee, tune in to find out!’ not a flat ‘no’ every time it came up. The shipper-base refusing to listen to that no does not make it bait.

And no, the homophobic gay jokes of ‘lol are you guys a couple???’ were not bait, they were endemic of the culture at the time that found the idea of two men actually being together a concept worth of mockery.

[fscom]

03. https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/7d30ca7ca724.png

Transcript by OP

[fscom]

I borrowed a manga from the library. It was great and thought I would buy the series for myself.

But I noticed that the publisher was Tokyopop. Fuck those IP thieves, I am not giving them any more money ever again.

Bonus secret: I did not give a shit about their Original English Language "manga", back then, they should just have focused on translating Japanese series.

But shafting creators with Rising Stars of Manga contract traps was wrong.

[fscom]

04. https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/aa13f9e09254.png

Transcript by OP

[fscom]

I think Nic Cage's version of Superman could've worked. Even, perhaps especially, with the goofy suit and hair. Cage has a knack for making that sort of thing just work.

[fscom]

05. https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/8c775774c6ab.png

Transcript by OP

[fscom]

I think the color version of Spider-Noir is superior. Please don't kill me.

[fscom]

06. https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/8c9164666acd.png

Transcript by OP

[fscom]

The Will Ferrell Lays commcercial airing now for the World Cup perfectly encapsulates how other countries see American soccer fans.

As an American soccer fan? It's embarrassing.

[fscom]

NS, NF, etc.

[fscom]

Official advertise your fandom-related event thread.

RULES FOR THIS:
1. NO images bigger than 600x600 in either direction (banners, et cetera).
2. ONE POST PER USER under this thread.
3. What IS allowed: roleplay advertisements, fandom comms, fandom events, things like that.
4. What is NOT allowed: anything for profit, any kind of fic/art commissions, seeking 1-on-1 RP, that kind of thing.

[fscom]

General comments:

(If the thread contains spoilery/triggery content please warn/post as 2nd comment so it collapses!
Please collapse images, too!)

[fscom]

Games thread!

[(Anonymous)]

Agree, on every count.

Queerbaiting requires bad-faith engagement with the shipper fanbase under the pretense that it's good-faith engagement. If it straight-up refutes the possibility of a ship 'going there' in canon, it's not queerbaiting, it's just a flat 'no'.

[(Anonymous)]

SA

Yes, even if they qualify it with "but feel free to have fun with your fanons/headcanons".

Still not queerbaiting.

Reminder: "Secrets you don't want to make..." thread is still up!

[(Anonymous)]

It'll be monitored until Monday's FS post goes up. You can leave your comment secrets here:

https://fandomsecrets.dreamwidth.org/3423345.html?thread=1157515377#cmt1157515377

Cheers,

a secret maker

[(Anonymous)]

I've seen most of the show, but didn't really engage in fandom because it just seemed too nuts. So I hadn't actually realized that the showrunners had been adamant that Johnlock wouldn't happen, period. Maybe because "queerbaiting" was thrown around so much that I assumed they were doing the "tee hee idk let's wait and see" thing.

IMO, there's been a weird shift in fandom culture since the olden days when I first got into it. Back when dinosaurs roamed the fandom, you didn't have the same level of expectation that your non-canon ship would become canon. It didn't matter if it was your OTP to end all OTPs, you just assumed you'd never see it IRL because that's how it worked. There was a much stronger boundary between the media vs. fandom in those days.

I miss those days.

[(Anonymous)]

I saw that ad. I don't begrudge Will Ferrell the fat paycheck I assume he got for it, but it did reek of desperation about the World Cup.

[(Anonymous)]

This is true. It was bad for other reasons.

[(Anonymous)]

God, me too.

The freedom of being able to play in that sandbox, knowing it would never be touched by canon, knowing it was all yours.

I've seen so many great shows and ships be dismissed out hand, people not even bothering to watch them at all because "it's not canon, so what's the point?". Kids, that is the damn point!