(Anonymous) 2010-01-10 06:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks!

[identity profile] lillbet.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 06:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm almost afraid to see where that link goes.

(no subject)

[identity profile] lillbet.livejournal.com - 2010-01-10 18:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] lillbet.livejournal.com - 2010-01-10 21:57 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] martoufmarty.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 06:12 pm (UTC)(link)
That video was AWESOME.

(no subject)

[identity profile] lily-lemony.livejournal.com - 2010-01-10 18:47 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] the-sell-out.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 06:17 pm (UTC)(link)
I like this video. It's exciting.

[identity profile] b-scholes.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 06:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Randomise! How would you define what a "huge" fandom is. There is loads of fandom secrets for Supernatural but there was loads for Dr Who when it had it's big episodes last week.

(no subject)

[identity profile] mizufae.livejournal.com - 2010-01-10 18:36 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] drunken-hedghog.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 06:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Group 'em. It might help people bitching about how many secrets X fandom has; they can just scroll past them in one fell swoop.
ocelotish: A girl with an ocelot on her shoulders (Default)

[personal profile] ocelotish 2010-01-10 06:32 pm (UTC)(link)

I'd prefer to group them, at least if there are a lot. I don't watch a lot of the shows the secerts tend to be about (e.g. Supernatural), so I don't really read them.

[identity profile] fickletastictot.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 06:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Locking! I mean... grouping is quite nice too. Second option.

[identity profile] puppy-tenchan.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 06:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Dude, when you link something that awesome, how can you expect useful votes!

[identity profile] magpieinthesky.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 06:33 pm (UTC)(link)
That video is AWESOME!!!

[identity profile] dbzmerciter2005.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 06:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Keeping large fandoms together will let me skip past them. I'm sick of seeing Supernatural and Dr. Who stuff, so being able to go "Okay this is X show" and scroll past would be wonderful.

I mean I might check out a secret anyways, especially if it has a ton of comments, but all in all grouping would be nice.

[identity profile] kidalana.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 06:45 pm (UTC)(link)
They're just anonymous secrets guuuuys. Why do we need to be so organized about it?

To the main point; that dancing duo was amazing.

[identity profile] mjisinbflo.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 07:27 pm (UTC)(link)
They're just anonymous secrets guuuuys. Why do we need to be so organized about it?

word. <3

[identity profile] outboxed.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 06:56 pm (UTC)(link)
I voted "randomize them!" because I like the surprise of scrolling down and discovering the next secret. I'm interested in some big and some small fandoms and often read secrets from fandoms I'm not a part of so the abundance of secrets from some doesn't really bother me, I guess.

[identity profile] sevendayloan.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 06:59 pm (UTC)(link)
This! Grouping takes a bit of the fun out of it, I think.

(no subject)

[identity profile] rosehiptea.livejournal.com - 2010-01-10 21:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] paopaotang.livejournal.com - 2010-01-10 19:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] 13chapters.livejournal.com - 2010-01-10 19:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] revengent.livejournal.com - 2010-01-10 19:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] melanth0.livejournal.com - 2010-01-10 21:42 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] timecake.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 06:57 pm (UTC)(link)
It may be an unpopular opinion but I really hate the grouping.
=/
It's just so much fun scrolling through all the secrets and having them randomized!

Awesome vid is awesome

[identity profile] kuro-tenshi13.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 07:07 pm (UTC)(link)
You know, when I first put the vid in my url bar, I was expecting a Rick Roll, so I was pleasantly surprised. <3

That said, I'm for randomizing them. Reading too many of one fandom in a row bores me and I wind up skimming over them.

[identity profile] remadi.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 07:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I really dislike grouping.

I think it's very boring to read secrets from the same fandom one after another. This includes big fandoms that I'm interested in and ones that I'm not.

It's not that hard to scroll past a secret that you're not interested in and with the big fandoms, if you've been reading these for a while, you can usually tell that a secret is about them just by looking at the picture. Takes less than a second to recognize and scroll past. I do it all the time.

[identity profile] rocks-not-dead.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 07:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Please randomise them. I kinda can't stand it to see tons of the same fandom in a row.

[identity profile] lililedger.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 07:17 pm (UTC)(link)
I was under the impression that this is how the community was already arranged...

I think it's easier to group it.

[identity profile] saramiskismet.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 07:35 pm (UTC)(link)
I've noticed the grouping over the last couple of weeks, I think he was testing i tout first so people know what to expect.

(no subject)

[identity profile] lililedger.livejournal.com - 2010-01-10 19:38 (UTC) - Expand
ext_10249: (fangirl)

[identity profile] nicole-anell.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 07:28 pm (UTC)(link)
God yes, PLEASE keep grouping the SPN, Torchwood, whatever fandoms are most popular together. I don't *always* scroll past them, but it feels rather silly when every 5-10 secrets is the same fandom.
kalliel: (Default)

[personal profile] kalliel 2010-01-10 07:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I figure it's just easier not to group them. And personally, I prefer getting the Glee, Dr. Who, Supernatural, etc. secrets un-grouped; sometimes I read the secrets for programs I'm not familiar with, but not if there's five million of them in a row.

[identity profile] blackbluesock.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 07:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Who cares about the poll? It's more important to bask in the awesomeness of the video.

To me, grouping them would be pointless. I just scroll fast the Supernatural ones easily enough anyway.

[identity profile] avocado-love.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 07:34 pm (UTC)(link)
I have a lot of fun with the randomness, honestly.

[identity profile] crimsonkitty88.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 07:44 pm (UTC)(link)
If we grouped em, I'd never look at any of the ones outside my main fandom. Just a thought. *shrugs* Though the fact that my main fandom could probably sustain f!s all on its own... lol

also: random awesome video is random and awesome

[identity profile] melanth0.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Your icon is very distracting.

[identity profile] haleysings.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 07:47 pm (UTC)(link)
I think it's more fun to dig through the secrets to find the fandoms you're interested in, personally. Besides, that's WAY more work for you.

[identity profile] goldenveila.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 09:09 pm (UTC)(link)
This, on both points. (Oh, hi there, person on my flist. No wonder I agree with you. ;) ) Honestly, I'm kind of annoyed that "yes" is winning, when adding the two options together. Lazy people are lazy. Does scrolling past a secret you don't care about really take all that long? Random=surprises, and I like surprises.

[identity profile] relvetica.livejournal.com 2010-01-10 07:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Grouping does kind of give the humorous impression that a whole set are all from the same person, but it makes things like avoiding spoilers easier.

Page 1 of 3