![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Group them. I don't read secrets about fandoms and characters I have no clue about anyway.
I'm joining the ranks of people who find grouping BORING! Spice it up a little :D
Whatever's easiest for you. This is just a Fun Internet Thing; there's no reason for you to make it more complicated than it needs to be ♥
NO GROUPING
GROUPING SUCKS
GROUPING IS BORING
WE THE PEOPLE NOT IN HUGEASS FANDOMS PROTEST MIGHTILY
GROUPING SUCKS
GROUPING IS BORING
WE THE PEOPLE NOT IN HUGEASS FANDOMS PROTEST MIGHTILY
I love surprises like others. And I kind of enjoying reading secrets for fandoms I'm not in, and conceivably never will be. Grouping them might ruin why I read particular secrets over others. And gets rid of the awesome when I find something I didn't expect. On the other hand, whoever says, "well I'll only look for __ and I'll leave" and say they'll miss the surprises and coming across things, I find far more lazy than those who are accused of finding "scrolling being hard".
That being said, several shows I *do* watch are on here (even if I'm not particularly active in their fandom). Since I don't live in the US, nor the UK, all the shows are either moderately or drastically behind (example, Dr Who, haven't seen the final, and conceivably won't for a while yet, they haven't even started advertising it yet). It makes it a lot easier to scroll past secrets for eps I haven't seen and spoilers. I'm fully aware that there could be spoilers here, and I'm careful, but avoiding a certain fandom’s secrets, without catching glimpses is way easier when they're grouped.
And to those saying "its so much more work for technophile", who do you think made the offer? Honestly, I'm not going to stop coming because they aren't grouped, but yeah, I think it'd be nice.
That being said, several shows I *do* watch are on here (even if I'm not particularly active in their fandom). Since I don't live in the US, nor the UK, all the shows are either moderately or drastically behind (example, Dr Who, haven't seen the final, and conceivably won't for a while yet, they haven't even started advertising it yet). It makes it a lot easier to scroll past secrets for eps I haven't seen and spoilers. I'm fully aware that there could be spoilers here, and I'm careful, but avoiding a certain fandom’s secrets, without catching glimpses is way easier when they're grouped.
And to those saying "its so much more work for technophile", who do you think made the offer? Honestly, I'm not going to stop coming because they aren't grouped, but yeah, I think it'd be nice.
I really wish everyone had voted for the fourth option.
I like the randomization, but I'm personally up for grouping when a day's post has around 5 or more secrets from the same fandom.
That video was pure awesome.
Definitely random- if there are lots of secrets for one fandom, the post just seems over saturated with them. Of course you can just scroll past but that's not interesting, I'm more likely to read secrets from different fandoms if they're all over the place. I don't really get why people who don't want to read secrets from other fandoms have such an issue with just scrolling past them. It's just reading and pressing the down key. Or the little scrolly thing on the mouse. Grouping makes it predictable and not quite as interesting. I suppose it could work in the case of spoilers, but there is a warning at the top after all.
(deleted comment)
Grouping things is already enough work, but this probably makes it more difficult. It'd be helpful to know though what the grouping rules would be.
I like it when you do it for the really huge fandoms, that way I can scroll past the EIGHTY GAJILLION SUPERNATURAL SECRETS that don't interest me. Also sometimes the results are amusing/ironic.
I think once it gets to the point that there are secrets complaining about how many secrets there are for a particular fandom, the grouping is kind of nice, but the randomization is so much better in general. When the secrets are grouped, it sounds like a bunch of people are arguing with each other, rather than unique, individual voices sharing opinions independently.
Are you planning on adding together the people for 1 and 2?
I ... kind of pictures the dancing duo as Holmes and Watson. DDD8
*should have submitted this as a secret, omg*
*should have submitted this as a secret, omg*
for you big blubbering babbys crying about randomization because oh no how dare you have to scroll past something you don't care about, i hope nobody responds to your secrets ever again.
WHAT A MAGICAL BUTTON. LEARN TO USE IT.
WHAT A MAGICAL BUTTON. LEARN TO USE IT.
I like it better not knowing what you're going to do next. Keep us on our toes.
Keep 'em grouped, if there's like 15 Torchwood secrets I don't give a shit about, I can scroll past them at once.
It depends on how would the grouping go. I mean I want to skip Supernatural and all animanga, so that's my vote. Group all animanga together by show, and live action by show/movie and the rest together by media.
Remember to add together the "yes" and "yes for the huge fandoms" percentages to get an accurate picture of the people who would, at the very least, want the big fandoms grouped. (I personally voted "yes", but if I'd realised how badly "yes" was loosing I'd have voted "yes for the huge fandoms" as being better than nothing.)
SHIT GUYS HELP ME MAKE MORE ACCOUNTS TO VOTE WE'RE BEHIND
GROUP GROUP GROUP!
GROUP GROUP GROUP!
I like random. I find it more interesting that way. I like coming randomly across fandoms I don't know anything about and being pleasantly confused, and even joining in if there's stuff like oppression wank. I also like randomly finding stuff from fandoms I do like.
Page 3 of 3