case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2010-02-04 05:21 pm

[ SECRET POST #1126 ]


⌈ Secret Post #1126 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

101.


__________________________________________________



102.


__________________________________________________



103.


__________________________________________________



104.


__________________________________________________



105.


__________________________________________________



106.


__________________________________________________



107.


__________________________________________________



108.


__________________________________________________



109.


__________________________________________________



110.


__________________________________________________



111.


__________________________________________________



112.


__________________________________________________



113.


__________________________________________________



114.


__________________________________________________



115.


__________________________________________________



116.


__________________________________________________



117.


__________________________________________________



118.


__________________________________________________



119.


__________________________________________________



120.


__________________________________________________



121.


__________________________________________________



122.


__________________________________________________



123.


__________________________________________________



124.


__________________________________________________



125.


__________________________________________________



126.


__________________________________________________



127.


__________________________________________________



128.


__________________________________________________



129.


__________________________________________________



130.


__________________________________________________



131.


__________________________________________________



132.


__________________________________________________



133.


__________________________________________________



134.


__________________________________________________



135.


__________________________________________________



136.


__________________________________________________



137.


__________________________________________________



138.


__________________________________________________



139.


__________________________________________________



140.


__________________________________________________



141.


__________________________________________________



142.


__________________________________________________



143.


__________________________________________________



144.


__________________________________________________



145.


__________________________________________________



146.


__________________________________________________



147.


__________________________________________________



148.


__________________________________________________



149.


__________________________________________________



150.


__________________________________________________



151.


__________________________________________________



152.


__________________________________________________



153.


__________________________________________________



154.


__________________________________________________



155.


__________________________________________________



156.


__________________________________________________



157.


__________________________________________________



158.


__________________________________________________



159.


__________________________________________________



160.


__________________________________________________



161.


__________________________________________________



162.


__________________________________________________



163.


__________________________________________________



164.


__________________________________________________



165.


__________________________________________________



166.


__________________________________________________



167.


__________________________________________________



168.


__________________________________________________



169.


__________________________________________________



170.


__________________________________________________



171.


__________________________________________________



172.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 078 secrets from Secret Submission Post #161.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 3 4 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - take it to comments ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
ext_81845: penelope, my art/character (your argument is boring me.)

[identity profile] childings.livejournal.com 2010-02-05 03:48 am (UTC)(link)
Well, as I've explained before, Jewish circumcision is different (see the film Europa Europa for example -- basically, there's foreskin still there, but it's cut so it doesn't cover the glans, not completely removed), but it's still body modification and I can understand why some people would be opposed to that. I know not all Jewish people get it done, but I'm not opposed to ritual circumcision or circumcision in general (even female circumcision -- the clitoral hood removal that is, not FGM), just the surgical procedure and the fact that doctors do it without asking the parents if they want it done (which is the real issue).

Also, I asked him if he would want it done and he said yes, so it's not just an assumption on my part, though obviously the reason is because he's Jewish, not because he would want the kid to look like other kids (an excuse many people make, which is actually the opposite of why Jews get it done) or because of "cleanliness" issues or whatever.

A side note -- one thing I learned while researching circumcision (for this paper I had to write in college) was that it wasn't typically done in the United States until around WWII, and one of the reasons people wanted it done was because they thought that it would discourage masturbation in males. The extent to which Americans in the post-war era were uptight about sexual issues is horrifying, to say the least.

ETA: I'm just glad to see that you have the same stance on body modification for both men and women, instead of being like a lot of women I talked to in college who generally though that male circumcision was okay but that female genitalia was to remain completely off limits. What a double standard.
Edited 2010-02-05 03:56 (UTC)
ext_2260: It's a side profile image of Dean Winchester rotated face down 45 degrees, almost black and white and dark with angst. (Default)

[identity profile] neth-dugan.livejournal.com 2010-02-05 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
Fair enough. The cleanliness thing would make sense when being able to was properly was still a problem, when access to water or clean water even was poor. So from cultures rooted in areas like that, historically, it does make sense. But it isn't really needed now so long as men wash themselves properly. It's more a cultural thing for some and a fitting in/ewwww thing for others.

And if he wants it done and you've no objection then... fair enough.


I'm against both so, y'know, even though I'm against the female one it's not hypocritical. Hadn't thought on it that way before but you're right. And yeah, I'm one of those odd 'feminists', though I'm sure some would refuse to call me that, where I believe women should be equal. As in treated equally where at all possible. I swear, sometimes it seems as though half the feminist movement isn't out there to get equality but superiority.


I'd heard it becoming popular in the US was because of that. Makes sense, for all that we Brits are supposed to be the stuck up and proper ones you guys can be the puritanical ones at times. Yes, lets go mutilate the bodies of our babies for no reason other than to stop them masturbating - which didn't even work.

*headbangs*
ext_81845: kai shiden w/ an awkward expression, from the manga gundam: the origin (awkward)

[identity profile] childings.livejournal.com 2010-02-05 05:54 am (UTC)(link)
even though I'm against the female one it's not hypocritical

Well, considering that the foreskin and the clitoral hood are about the same (in gestation the fetus either develops a penis or clitoris, or sometimes something inbetween, but it's basically the same) I think clitoral hood removal and circumcision are the same, except nobody in our society expects women to get theirs removed (and keeping in mind FGM is something else entirely, that would be akin to scraping a dude's balls off with the remains of a rusty coke can and sewing it up without sterilizing anything).
DISREGARD I NEED TO LEARN HOW TO READ. Obviously I read too fast.

When I was writing my paper I came across the writings of some women who voluntarily had their clitoral hood removed and said (like some cut men claim, but again, YMMV) that it made clitoral stimulation easier and more intense (of course, you can just pull back the hood when you stimulate the clitoris, and it retracts when the clitoris is stimulated, just like with the penis' foreskin). Of course, I realize how hypocritical I am because I wouldn't get my daughter's clitoral hood removed (though I would think that would be difficult to do in childhood anyway) but I'd be okay with circumcising my son (though not okay with the complete removal of the foreskin). :/ So I don't really fault you either way.

The official reason why Jews do it is because it's a physical sign of your covenant with God, which, of course, excludes women (maybe there's some crackpot Jews out there who remove the clitoral hood but I don't know of any). Of course, it would be easier to tell if a man is circumcised than a women in that case. It's kind of like eating kosher -- the entire point is that it's different (and sometimes inconvenient) because it's a constant reminder that you're different from other people. Not necessarily better, but that you have a unique relationship with God and you're expected to abide by certain laws that other people don't.

Edited 2010-02-05 06:04 (UTC)
ext_2260: It's a side profile image of Dean Winchester rotated face down 45 degrees, almost black and white and dark with angst. (Default)

[identity profile] neth-dugan.livejournal.com 2010-02-05 12:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I'm aware it's because of some text written in the Tanakh and that's what it means to Jews now. There was this lego version of the Old Testament/Tanakh and it was mentioned once or twice in RE at school (Religious Education).

But I'm a great big atheist, tend to think think that there's a more likely explanation for how it all started than , ah, God, coming down and demanding men mutilate their penises to show their devotion. Though given some of the other stuff in that book it's not out of character. And it seems reasonable that it started off as a cleanliness thing.

End excluding women is not exactly a new thing, nor one isolated to Judaism and circumcision.

ext_36848: (Well how bout that)

[identity profile] andreth47.livejournal.com 2010-02-05 05:27 pm (UTC)(link)
There's a lot of discussion even about the cleanliness issue alone. People cite studies where bacterial infection of the urethra is more common in uncircumsized males. The arguments are based on pH and how it affects the proper bacterial environment (similarly to how douches can negatively affect the pH of the vagina; removing the foreskin can negatively affect the natural, healthy pH of the urethra).

TMI?
ext_2260: It's a side profile image of Dean Winchester rotated face down 45 degrees, almost black and white and dark with angst. (ST Data)

[identity profile] neth-dugan.livejournal.com 2010-02-05 05:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Nah.

I haven't heard of men over here being worse off in health in that regards compared to men in the US where it's common. So it can't be that great, and if you wash properly it doesn't seem to really matter.


ETA: Don't worry about the TMI. It isn't like it's TMI about a specific person who hasn't given their permission for it. It's more in the biology field of things so seeing this from an academic PoV. Probably helps that unless I'm getting into the headspace of someone else I only really see them as silly looking organs males spend a lot of time thinking on or as a part of biology.


Son of ETA: And not to say that there's no difference, but from what I've read different reports say different things and there's medical pros and cons on both sides. None of which seem to be that great in all so long as men was themselves properly.
Edited 2010-02-05 17:55 (UTC)
ext_36848: (Tick)

[identity profile] andreth47.livejournal.com 2010-02-05 06:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, yeah. That's what I was saying: there is a lot of discussion on the issue.

I spend a lot of time thinking about dicks, too, (female here), and I don't find them silly looking at all. Rather attractive, actually. Especially when uncircumsized!
ext_2260: It's a side profile image of Dean Winchester rotated face down 45 degrees, almost black and white and dark with angst. (Default)

[identity profile] neth-dugan.livejournal.com 2010-02-05 07:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Female here and... I don't find them attractive. Don't find the vulva attractive either. Cooould be because I'm asexual lol.

Was thinking about adding in women talking about penises cause they do but figured you'd had enough edits already lol.


Maybe one day there will be firm data pointing in one direction but it seems doubtful. Till then it's a matter of if you think it's right to put a baby through that when they can't give permission or not.

tl;dr: Genital Mutilation Bad

[identity profile] kryss-labryn.livejournal.com 2010-02-06 06:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Personally, I think it's wrong to remove healthy tissue from anyone who can't give consent without there being a pressing medical reason to do so (the same as (and I realize it's not the same thing because circumcision isn't major surgery but it's the only comparison I could come up with off the cuff) I wouldn't have my son's appendix removed on the off chance that he might get appendicitis at some point in the future). If the guy wants to get it done as an adult, then fine, it's his choice (but he might want to research carefully first because I am given to understand that it does result in less sensation), but to do it to a baby who can't give consent I don't like at all. If there's a religious reason then I bite my tongue and say nothing because however much I might dislike it I am not going to interfere with someone else's religious practices-- although I am hypocritical enough to strongly object to FGM whether for religious reasons or not-- but then, circumcision doesn't prevent guys from enjoying sex at all, so there you go).

But I have heard such STUPID reasons for mutilating baby boys!! There's the old standby "I want him to look like me/his dad" (because heaven forbid we should simply explain to the kid that Daddy's foreskin was cut off and his wasn't), or that it prevents penile cancer (it drops the rate by about one third-- from about 3 per 100,000 to 1 per 100,000 so really, not much point) to-- and I swear to god I was standing right there-- "My mum's a nurse in a nursing home and she says that when the guys get over eighty some of the uncircumcised men have trouble keeping themselves clean and get UTI's so I want him circumcised to prevent that." >< Okay, points for looking ahead, but why cut off perfectly healthy tissue and risk damage to his penis (not to mention the pain the poor kids go through-- it's usually done without anaesthetic) and the loss of sensation from having their diaper and clothes abrading the unprotected glans all the time-- why do all that, just so that IF he lives to be eighty and IF he ends up in a nursing home and IF he ends up having trouble keeping himself clean he doesn't RISK UTI's?? I mean, kudos for looking ahead, I guess, but of all the dumbass reasons... >
ext_2260: It's a side profile image of Dean Winchester rotated face down 45 degrees, almost black and white and dark with angst. (Default)

Re: tl;dr: Genital Mutilation Bad

[identity profile] neth-dugan.livejournal.com 2010-02-06 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, I agree with you. Though I tend to say that it's stupid even for religious reason, if a bit more tactfully. Because it is tradition and they do believe it's a pact with their god and it's not my child I don't shout about it bit...

It's one of those areas where it's kinda hard respecting the rights of other parents, of other beliefs all the while having a giant fundamental objection to it all.


And seriously, whilst the old person thing might be a valid reason to be cut when you're older there is NOTHING stopping him from getting cut closer to the time.

Re: tl;dr: Genital Mutilation Bad

[identity profile] kryss-labryn.livejournal.com 2010-02-06 07:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, that's just it! In fact, I said to her (being a bit sleep-deprived at the time lol, but I did say it nicely), "Then why not just wait and if he does have those issues as an old man he can get cut then if that's what he wants?"

Haha she looked at me a bit funny because I was sort of butting in on her conversation (but she was standing right there), but I think the doctor talked her out of it anyways because as I left he was going, "Well, you know, it really isn't necessary and we don't usually do it..." Ah, the joys of hospital stays lol. (she came up to the counter at the nurses' station while I was standing there myself and was like, "Hey, while I'm here, can we just do this too?" XD

I hear ya about the religious stuff. On the one hand, I really honestly truly do object to it (one of the grandmas in my son's playgroup told me her like one-month-old grandson was getting "done" the next day and I tried to (nicely and politely and not pushily because after all, it isn't my kid) to give her an alternate point of view, but I don't think I changed her mind and I'm pretty sure they had it done. ): I honestly felt like barfing and it was really hard for me that day (haha I really do feel very strongly about it being done to babies)-- but not my kid).

I am extra-sensitive to the rights of parents, though, especially when it comes to religion, because I am not a mainstream religion myself and it isn't too long ago that me and my husband being Heathens would have been grounds for child protection services to step in and remove our kids (because, you know, white and following a pagan tradition = OMGSATANISTS!! ><), so I'm reeeeaaaally careful about respecting others' rights, the same as I want them to respect mine. But I don't have to like it. :P

In other news, the rate of circumcision in Canada has dropped dramatically; I think my generation was the last one to get it done routinely ( a lot of my younger friends aren't cut), and our Medical Services Plan no longer covers it because it's not a medically necessary treatment. Means that if you want it done you have to cough up the $150 or whatever it is yourselves, which might discourage people who are on the fence, which is good.

(haha cut for length; continued below)

Re: tl;dr: Genital Mutilation Bad

[identity profile] kryss-labryn.livejournal.com 2010-02-06 07:39 pm (UTC)(link)
(damn I'm long-winded! lol)

Sadly, I heard that the States is considering making it mandatory as uncut guys apparently pick up HIV more easily (apparently there are receptors on the underside of the foreskin, according to Wikipedia, at least). This is really stupid and makes me deeply unhappy, because WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH TELLING GUYS TO WEAR A GODDAMNED CONDOM!!?! >< Mutilating babies against their parents' wishes to "prevent" a virus that (a) isn't completely prevented by circumcision (yes, the incidence drops but isn't eliminated, and in the case of something deadly let's make sure, shall we?)and (b) IS prevented by using a condom is the height of arrogant stupidity, to me.

Years ago (about ten I think) there was a move to outlaw genital mutilation in the States. People (senators and stuff) were all gung-ho about it as it pertained to girls (what?? Chop perfectly healthy bits of their genitals off?? Of course that's wrong! Where do I sign?" but as soon as they realized that it would apply to circumcisions as well they backed right off. So apparently what's sauce for the goose isn't sauce for the gander, after all. I think it did get passed, but modified to specifically forbid female genital mutilation, but not male. *Sigh...*

I don't get the "Ew" factor, myself. I think they look tidier with them, and I'm told it makes for better lovers, because (a) being more sensitive, orgasms don't sneak up on them the same way, so they can slow down as needed, and (b) dude, the foreskin ridges up. You know those condoms, "ridged for her pleasure"? Yeah, like that. XD So ladies, there's an excellent reason to not cut; their future girlfriends (and hell, boyfriends too probably lol) will thank you. XD

Me, I didn't get my son cut, and have simply been teaching him, pretty much at every bath since he was born, that at some point when he pulls back on his foreskin his penis will pop out, and then he'll need to clean under there too, just like he does everywhere else. Been telling him about condoms and what they're for since he was born too, haha (not constantly, but every now and then when the subject of babies comes up). Not gonna have any of this embarrassed, "Son, we need to have a talk..." three years after he's started having sex in my house... XD

Haha, sorry; MUCH tl;dr. XD Also got my 11 notifications from LJ too so now I feel all loved. lol
ext_2260: It's a side profile image of Dean Winchester rotated face down 45 degrees, almost black and white and dark with angst. (Default)

Re: tl;dr: Genital Mutilation Bad

[identity profile] neth-dugan.livejournal.com 2010-02-06 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)
S'okay about the long thing.

I'm British so generally we're better at that sort of thing but we do get our own crazy incidents. I'm an atheist and one of the girls I went to school with, though she was the year below, was a pagan. We used to joke that she was the Stantist and I was the godless Heathen. Just to take the piss. We didn't have it too bad though, there were a couple other non religious people there, Hindus, Sikhs, Muslims along with the Christians and Jews. Strangely we didn't talk about our beliefs much so I don't know much about paganism. Not exactly sure what the difference between it and wicca is actually. Oddly (insert sarcasm) they didn't mention the new age stuff, alongside the atheist view, in RE (religious education, compulsory from age 11 to 16).

I know it's been harder over there for a while and probably still isn't all that easy. Hopefully it'll continue to get better for you and other religious minorities. I didn't realise they were likely to take your children away before though.

Except in extreme circumstances I am against medical actions on an unconsenting human, and dead set against serious ones. Babies and those who aren't able to make choices themselves I can understand but you don't go and do something so serious as body modification on them unless you've a damned good reason.

You wouldn't get a baby a tattoo would you? Then why would you cut a baby. I'm also against procedures done on intersex babies to try and force them into one or another - unless medically NEEDED. And the idea that some people are so okay with it all is just frightening to me.


And oh god, the 'ewww' thing or the 'look like his father' thing are about the worst excuses ever. As I said some place in the thread, I think cut and uncut penises look as funny as each other lol. Don't know how you'd was one or handle one, really, and I've heard the pleasure thing increases but also wouldn't know. But doesnt seem like something you'd want to take away.

Sounds like you're raising him well though *g* I don't even remember if I got it or if I picked it up over time or.... something. I imagine it's less traumatising than having parents sit you down one day and tell you.