case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2010-02-25 06:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #1147 ]


⌈ Secret Post #1147 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

101.


__________________________________________________



102.


__________________________________________________



103.


__________________________________________________



104.


__________________________________________________



105.


__________________________________________________



106.


__________________________________________________



107.


__________________________________________________



108.


__________________________________________________



109.


__________________________________________________



110.


__________________________________________________



111.


__________________________________________________



112.


__________________________________________________



113.


__________________________________________________



114.


__________________________________________________



115.


__________________________________________________



116.


__________________________________________________



117.


__________________________________________________



118.


__________________________________________________



119.


__________________________________________________



120.


__________________________________________________



121.


__________________________________________________



122.


__________________________________________________



123.


__________________________________________________



124.


__________________________________________________



125.


__________________________________________________



126.


__________________________________________________



127.


__________________________________________________



128.


__________________________________________________



129.


__________________________________________________



130.


__________________________________________________



131.


__________________________________________________



132.


__________________________________________________



133.


__________________________________________________



134.


__________________________________________________



135.


__________________________________________________



136.


__________________________________________________



137.


__________________________________________________



138.


__________________________________________________



139.


__________________________________________________



140.


__________________________________________________



141.


__________________________________________________



142.


__________________________________________________



143.


__________________________________________________



144.


__________________________________________________



145.


__________________________________________________



146.


__________________________________________________



147.


__________________________________________________



148.


__________________________________________________



149.


__________________________________________________



150.


__________________________________________________



151.


__________________________________________________



152.


__________________________________________________



153.


__________________________________________________



154.


__________________________________________________



155.


__________________________________________________



156.


__________________________________________________



157.


__________________________________________________



158.


__________________________________________________



159.


__________________________________________________



160.


__________________________________________________



161.


__________________________________________________



162.


__________________________________________________



163.


__________________________________________________



164.


__________________________________________________



165.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #164.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Not the OP but...

(Anonymous) 2010-02-25 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Sure you can :D It's not everyones cup of tea though. Sometimes people pick an OTP and that's that. I can sympothise being a die hard K/S Shipper myself.

Re: Not the OP but...

(Anonymous) 2010-02-25 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
This. Some people mulit-ship. Some don't. I can understand being so devoted to one pairing you can't see any others involving certain characters. That's not a crime now, is it? Or suddenly reason to call someone a racist?

Re: Not the OP but...

[identity profile] kitty-wake.livejournal.com 2010-02-25 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
No, I just thought it seemed like very faulty logic. "I can't support A/B because I'm so devoted to A/C!"

Re: Not the OP but...

[identity profile] snowlight.livejournal.com 2010-02-26 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
It's actually very logical. I like seeing A/B together, therefore I don't want to see them be broken up in any way, shape, or form.

Which is why being a OTP K/S shipper, I will never read K/Mc or S/U fics. I'm sure there are good fics for those two pairings out there, but until hell freezes over, I'm not gonna read them. :)

Re: Not the OP but...

[identity profile] kitty-wake.livejournal.com 2010-02-26 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
But they're not being broken up... they're just not being shipped.

Re: Not the OP but...

(Anonymous) 2010-02-26 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
It's a matter of preference.

OTP means One True Pairing, and for some people that's really true. They find a pairing that they like and the focus solely on that. Just because of it, it doesn't mean that they hate Uhura because she's black/female, it's because she's not their cup of tea, and that's okay. Sometimes you can dislike a character or pairing and there isn't sexist/racist implications behind it. It's very narrow-minded, or rather a black and white perception.

Re: Not the OP but...

[identity profile] snowlight.livejournal.com 2010-02-26 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
For the record, I would like to say that I don't dislike Uhura, for any reason. :) Well uh, I might resent her a little for calling Kirk a dumb farmboy who has sex with animals just because Kirk tried a pickup line on her, but that's a different story.

However, I dislike S/U. I dislike S/U for the same reason I dislike K/Mc, because they both are in conflict with K/S. (But technically I guess I could be racist against both white and black people, sexist, plus homophobic? You never know. :D)

Re: Not the OP but...

[identity profile] snowlight.livejournal.com 2010-02-26 12:58 am (UTC)(link)
*blink*

Allow me to explain my view on the matter to you, from the POV of an OTP shipper:

My ship = A/B
Breaking up my ship = A/C, B/D
Not shipping my ship = A/C, B/D, C/D

I have no particular feeling about C/D, but I will not go anywhere near A/C or B/D. In fact, they are probably my anti-OTPs.

I am not saying you should understand this, but the fact is there are people who feel strongly about this kind of thing.

Re: Not the OP but...

[identity profile] kitty-wake.livejournal.com 2010-02-26 01:01 am (UTC)(link)
Great.

I am this close to channeling the Shat.

Re: Not the OP but...

[identity profile] diorama23.livejournal.com 2010-02-26 08:44 am (UTC)(link)
I think it's logical if that is your preference. There are plenty of ships I don't like or can support because I like another ship which competes with it. But I've almost always been a OTP person, sometimes I find a secondary OTP, but I can't support if it overlaps my primary OTP.

But not liking another ship doesn't mean I 'hate' the ship, or those who support it, it's just that I can support it myself.

Re: Not the OP but...

[identity profile] kitty-wake.livejournal.com 2010-02-25 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah. You see, I'm the sort of person who gets more into a character. The closest I come to having OTPs is having anti-OTPs, if you see what I mean.

I think Sulu/Chekov is the closest I have ever come to having an OTP, mainly because the other common Chekov-pairings kind of squick me with the age difference stuff.

Re: Not the OP but...

(Anonymous) 2010-02-25 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
:D I tend to ship the two characters I adore the most! So in Star Trek case K/S :3 I just think that I'd find reading fic with them paired with another character...weird.

I don't think it's wrong, and I'm all for ship and let ship and I certainly don't hate, but you know, it's just not something I'd be interested in 'cause I have my OTP.

Sulu/Chekov is cute &hearts

I get what you mean though.

Re: Not the OP but...

(Anonymous) 2010-02-25 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Chekov/Sulu has the best pairingsmush name ngl.

And I'm with you about the squicky age difference with other common Chekov pairings but only in Reboot!verse

Re: Not the OP but...

(Anonymous) 2010-02-26 03:20 am (UTC)(link)
Hardly surprising, if we consider that in TOS Sulu/Chekov is the only common Chekov pairing.

Re: Not the OP but...

[identity profile] kinkme.livejournal.com 2010-02-26 09:06 am (UTC)(link)
I think Sulu/Chekov is the closest I have ever come to having an OTP

That is my OTP, and never having an OTP before (just "a pairing which I call my OTP because I mostly write and/or read it") and being the multishipper of doom, I wouldn't have understood this secret about three months ago and reached the same conclusion.

But now, if I decided to casually read Chekov/Scotty (something I had written before OMG OTP OF DOOM) I I would, and do, actually wince, because... just... where the hell is Sulu and why is he not with Chekov. I don't... understand. Does not compute.

I can understand disliking a ship because it interferes with your OTP because of this. Writing Chekov/Scotty fic doesn't harm my OTP in anyway, but I would still get confused and that back tab would appear so tempting.

Re: Not the OP but...

(Anonymous) 2010-02-25 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, like others have said, this. I tend to be pretty die-hard about my pairings.