case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2010-03-17 06:09 pm

[ SECRET POST #1168 ]


⌈ Secret Post #1168 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

101.


__________________________________________________



102.


__________________________________________________



103.


__________________________________________________



104.


__________________________________________________



105.


__________________________________________________



106.


__________________________________________________



107.


__________________________________________________



108.


__________________________________________________



109.


__________________________________________________



110.


__________________________________________________



111.


__________________________________________________



112.


__________________________________________________



113.


__________________________________________________



114.


__________________________________________________



115.


__________________________________________________



116.


__________________________________________________



117.


__________________________________________________



118.


__________________________________________________



119.


__________________________________________________



120.


__________________________________________________



121.


__________________________________________________



122.


__________________________________________________



123.


__________________________________________________



124.


__________________________________________________



125.


__________________________________________________



126.


__________________________________________________



127.


__________________________________________________



128.


__________________________________________________



129.


__________________________________________________



130.


__________________________________________________



131.


__________________________________________________



132.


__________________________________________________



133.


__________________________________________________



134.


__________________________________________________



135.


__________________________________________________



136.


__________________________________________________



137.


__________________________________________________



138.


__________________________________________________



139.


__________________________________________________



140.


__________________________________________________



141.


__________________________________________________



142.


__________________________________________________



143.


__________________________________________________



144.


__________________________________________________



145.


__________________________________________________



146.


__________________________________________________



147.


__________________________________________________



148.


__________________________________________________



149.


__________________________________________________



150.


__________________________________________________



151.


__________________________________________________



152.


__________________________________________________



153.


__________________________________________________



154.


__________________________________________________



155.


__________________________________________________



156.


__________________________________________________



157.


__________________________________________________



158.


__________________________________________________



159.


__________________________________________________



160.


__________________________________________________



161.


__________________________________________________



162.


__________________________________________________



163.


__________________________________________________



164.


__________________________________________________



165.



Notes:

April 1st Submissions Post is open!

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 126 secrets from Secret Submission Post #167.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 3 4 5 - too big ], [ 1 2 3 - ships it ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(frozen comment) Re: 151

[identity profile] angathol.livejournal.com 2010-03-18 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think it's necessary to sensationalize the atrocities of WWII even further through film.

There's a reason why the artist Jean Fautrier made his "Hostage" series of paintings so vague and formless; even though they directly referenced the horrors of the war directly after the war, they did not sensationalize them.

I just think that it's in bad taste.

(frozen comment) Re: 151

[identity profile] nadiayar.livejournal.com 2010-03-18 01:16 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think that truth can ever be in a bad taste. I also find that it is really necessary to further sensationalize the atrocities of WWII through film, namely the Japanese atrocities. Because those somehow got swept under the carpet and the Germans got to be painted as *the* monsters of WWII. Japan was no better. This must become a commonly accepted fact. Something else would be unfair to the victims, to the Americans who fought Japan, and to the Germans.

(frozen comment) Re: 151

[identity profile] angathol.livejournal.com 2010-03-18 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think it's necessary to do it in a dramatized movie, because people will miss the point and go see it for the sake of getting off on violence instead of learning what really happened. The chances of that kind of movie depicting what really happened without glorifying it are slim. A documentary, perhaps, but not some kind of Tarantino gorefest. It may be unfair to have it swept under the carpet, but it's even less fair to the victims to have them portrayed in some blockbuster movie for people who want to see gory shit go down. It's excessive.

Anything Tarantino does is in bad taste, anyway.

(frozen comment) Re: 151

[identity profile] nadiayar.livejournal.com 2010-03-18 01:48 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think it's necessary to do it in a dramatized movie, because people will miss the point and go see it for the sake of getting off on violence instead of learning what really happened.

And that's where the movie must grab them by their souls and show them the truth. Use their sensation lust to grab their attention and enlighten them. It can be done and it must be done. This movie really should be made.

Anything Tarantino does is in bad taste, anyway.

That's the taste the world loves:) Spicing truth with it would attract public attention, that's part of why we need such movies.

(frozen comment) Re: 151

[identity profile] angathol.livejournal.com 2010-03-18 01:52 am (UTC)(link)
While they're at it, they can make a movie about everything the Russians did.

But of course, that wouldn't be much fun for you, now, would it? It'd probably be about 200 hours long, anyway. :)

(frozen comment) Re: 151

[identity profile] nadiayar.livejournal.com 2010-03-18 02:07 am (UTC)(link)
A movie about *everything* the Russians did? You mean, about them stopping and destroying the Nazi war machine and chasing the Wehrmacht back home, which was the main thing they did? Bring it on! :))) It would be nothing for you, of course, but I would watch it.

There already are good movies about the Eastern front. My favourites are "Enemy at the Gates" (American) and "Go and see" (Russian). Go and see them:)

(frozen comment) Re: 151

[identity profile] angathol.livejournal.com 2010-03-18 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
I have seen Enemy at the Gates.

If you're going to complain about people sweeping things under the carpet, you might as well put the negative aspects of the Russian involvement in the war out in the open.

Fair is fair. You can't look at the Soviet Union through rose-coloured glasses.

(frozen comment) Re: 151

[identity profile] nadiayar.livejournal.com 2010-03-18 02:12 am (UTC)(link)
Sure. I think the movie should also address the German-Soviet pact, and hopefully name the real reason behind it.

I have seen Enemy at the Gates.

Watch "Go and see", too. It's very realistic.

(frozen comment) Re: 151

[identity profile] spoggly.livejournal.com 2010-03-18 04:37 am (UTC)(link)
i am fucking curious as to "the real reason"

because i have a tingling sensation that "invading poland" is not your answer!

learn2troll better

(frozen comment) Re: 151

[identity profile] qichi.livejournal.com 2010-03-18 01:52 am (UTC)(link)
And why are we trying to show the world that the Germans and Japanese suck because of this war and we should hate them forever? Meanwhile, the Allies did terrible things too, but they get a free pass on having their actions depicted in film because they won?

(frozen comment) Re: 151

[identity profile] spoggly.livejournal.com 2010-03-18 01:57 am (UTC)(link)
srsly

please, please, please, let's continue the remembrance of those killed/murdered/affected by the war and the atrocities committed by germany and japan, but not at the expense of ignoring the atrocities of other nations, and NOT BASED ON A COMEDY MANGA

(frozen comment) Re: 151

[identity profile] nadiayar.livejournal.com 2010-03-18 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
The Allies get a free pass? Who said that? Certainly not I. I did mention Hiroshima in the first comment, after all. I would also mention the Dresden bombing, and the plight of the German refugees. You misunderstand - I like my heroes dirty, like Tarantino's Basterds. Dirty, but right.

(frozen comment) Re: 151

[identity profile] qichi.livejournal.com 2010-03-18 02:25 am (UTC)(link)
you're
you're still calling them heroes - if there is anything to be learned from history, it's that every side is PEOPLE. and people make mistakes

allies ≠ heroes
axis ≠ villains

i won't argue that the allied side was essentially the good side in the conflict but you can't sweepingly condemn everything bad the axis did as DESPICABLE AND HORRIBLE but then say an equal portrayal of the allied side would just be "dirty and gritty"

(frozen comment) Re: 151

[identity profile] passthepeaches.livejournal.com 2010-03-18 03:39 am (UTC)(link)
THISSSSSSSSSSSS

I don't know you but A++++ comment BB

(frozen comment) Re: 151

[identity profile] nadiayar.livejournal.com 2010-03-18 04:56 am (UTC)(link)
Why, of course the Allies are heroes, but heroes in a classical sense: strong gritty men battling monsters. People don't need to remain completely guilt-free in a Disney-esque manner to be heroes. Have you seen "Inglourious Basterds"? The Basterds are cruel bordering on sadistic, they are extremely unpleasant people, but they still are heroes. Heroes are not something like Spiderman, you know. Courage, strength, and the essencially right side are what makes a hero.

axis ≠ villains

No? The Third Reich which exterminated dozens of millions of civilians everywhere it could reach because they had the "wrong" ethnicity is not villainous to you? I can't sweepingly condemn *the several genocides* the Axis committed as DESPICABLE AND HORRIBLE? But of course I can, and I will. An equal portrayal of the Allied side would not be "dirty and gritty". I'm not opposed to dirty and gritty. It would be libelous. As in, deliberately untrue.

(frozen comment) Re: 151

(Anonymous) 2010-03-18 05:38 am (UTC)(link)
Villainy doesn't exist in the real world.

A human is a human. There are not 'good' and 'bad' people, just people. Adolf Hitler was a charismatic person and was good with manipulating others. It doesn't make him evil. It makes him charismatic and manipulative.

Cardboard cut-out villains were fabricated to get people to rally the troops and fight for their own side with added vigor. And if you're trying to say that there is always a hero and a villain, what about the Cold War? Not a single shot was fired, of course, but who was wrong and who was right? Was anyone definitely the hero? What about the villain?

There are as many views as there are people, wars included.