ext_278733 (
grayout.livejournal.com) wrote in
fandomsecrets2007-04-30 06:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #115 ]
⌈ Secret Post #115 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

Notes:
Posting for Liz!
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 72 secrets from Secret Submission Post #017.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Tuesday, May 1st, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Criticism is one thing. Telling someone to stop altogether is something totally different, and it's pretty self-centered. Just because YOU don't like how they do something doesn't mean there's other people that do. It also doesn't mean that they don't enjoy it, and you have no right to tell them to stop.
And anyway, maybe they just need a nudge (or shove) in the right direction?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Poster of 18.
(Anonymous) 2007-05-01 03:36 pm (UTC)(link)It's more like I know that they have more potential than what they are showing, yet they're not improving at all. It's only those that don't seem to be getting any better, doing the status quo, people cheering them on for it so that it keeps up that just annoys the hell out of me. It is kind of one of those things that I want to shake them and say, you can do much better if you do it another way. The reason why I want them to stop is it seems like they've already stopped caring about what they're doing -- or rather the ideas of improving.
But like I said, the reason that this is a secret is because of the chicken shit answer of a) they're just going to say that this is what they do and they'll keep doing it however they feel like (which may or may not be improving at all) because I'm just asking them to do it my way; and b) their fans and friends will jump and claw my eyes out for even saying anything negative. *laughs* Which is kind of what happened, huh?
Re: Poster of 18.
Re: Poster of 18.
(Anonymous) 2007-05-01 05:11 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Poster of 18.