ext_278733 ([identity profile] grayout.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-05-19 05:15 pm

[ SECRET POST #134 ]


⌈ Secret Post #134 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.




Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 90 secrets from Secret Submission Post #020.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Sunday, May 20th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] lostremnant.livejournal.com 2007-05-20 04:08 am (UTC)(link)
Then that's the fault of the people using the program. I don't know it just seems to me that blaming a rendering program for bad art is like blaming a paintbrush for bad art. Rendering programs are just a tool as is a paintbrush. If a person doesn't know how to use a paintbrush or if they use a lousy quality one then they're likely to end up with something that doesn't look very good.

I'll admit though that if someone is trying to produce 3D art without having the slightest knowledge of producing 2D art then they probably aren't going to know what the hell they're doing. It's like people doing abstract art without having done any representational art first. If people are using a rendering program without having paid their dues so to speak then the results probably aren't going to be very good because you still have to know the basics. Otherwise it is as people complain just having the machine do it all and well that's what you end up with...a machine produced piece with no real soul in it.