ext_278733 ([identity profile] grayout.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-05-21 07:06 pm

[ SECRET POST #136 ]


⌈ Secret Post #136 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.




Notes:

No idea whose day it is, but it wasn't up, so...

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 60 secrets from Secret Submission Post #020.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Tuesday, May 22nd, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] militarypenguin.livejournal.com 2007-05-22 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
8. Signed. It would be awesome to have your art iconed, credit be damned. As long as the person isn't claiming the art to be theirs, I don't see what the big deal is. I've never seen a case where the other people assumed that the person who made the icon also made the art in it, either.

[identity profile] luzerna.livejournal.com 2007-05-22 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly. x(

I never, ever see iconmakers make icons of their own stuff unless it's for personal use only. That'd look too egotistical, and that's not good for your reputation.

Going on that I don't know why anyone would assume that the fanart in the icon was drawn by the iconmaker, so I don't really see a problem in using it. I can find the artist and the full picture easily if there's credit given, so that's nice. But if it's not there I don't see why anyone should be blowing a gasket over it, especially if they don't have relations with any of the people involved. That's just silly. =|