case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2010-12-30 04:16 pm

[ SECRET POST #1457 ]


⌈ Secret Post #1457 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18. [broken]


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________



23.


__________________________________________________



24.


__________________________________________________



25.


__________________________________________________



26.


__________________________________________________



27.


__________________________________________________



28.


__________________________________________________



29.


__________________________________________________



30.


__________________________________________________



31.


__________________________________________________



32.


__________________________________________________



33.


__________________________________________________



34.


__________________________________________________



35.


__________________________________________________



36.


__________________________________________________



37.


__________________________________________________



38.


__________________________________________________



39.


__________________________________________________



40.


__________________________________________________



41.


__________________________________________________



42.


__________________________________________________



43.


__________________________________________________



44.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #208.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] kallanda-lee.livejournal.com 2010-12-31 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
See, that is exactly what would confuse me...because the word itself seems to imply a disinterest in sex altogether.

And while porn is very much different to inter human sexual attraction (which is my case is a much more muddy, overlapping business with emotional aspect to it too), I do see it as being in the same spectrum.

it's hard to explain, too.

But let's try to simplify: while i do not necessarily wish to re-enact porn, the 'principles of arousal' would be the same.
So, for example,the type of man I'd fetishize in pornography, while I might not necessarily want a relationship with him, I'd still find him *sexually attractive* in r/l.

So in that way, I'd find it hard to imagine to like porn, but to not like what I consider to be a physically attractive male in r/l, as the arousal does sort of have similar triggers...

Does that make sense at all?

[identity profile] dorknessrising.livejournal.com 2010-12-31 01:55 am (UTC)(link)
Not really. The only reason you would find the "principles of arousal" to be the same is because you feel sexual attraction to people in the first place. Which is the difference between you and asexuals. For us, the "principle" isn't the same because we do not feel that attraction.

For me, porn is no different than written erotica. It's just the kind that I don't need to read. I find the idea of what the performers are doing arousing, but I don't find any of them attractive. As in if they were sitting there naked on my couch, I'd shrug and go back to playing Modern Warfare.

I'm sorry if I'm coming off overly snippy. I don't mean to. I've just heard this exact same argument from sexual people all my life trying to convince me that they know my sexuality and what I should identify as so much better than I do.

(Anonymous) 2010-12-31 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
Just jumping in here to say but thank you for taking the time to explain and not just stomping off yelling NOT MY JOB. This has been really helpful to me.

[identity profile] kallanda-lee.livejournal.com 2010-12-31 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
No, you don't sound snippy. I'm genuinely trying to understand...as to me it's a very foreign concept.

I think you explained fairly well, at least I have a bit more insight (I think).

So the idea or the act can be arousing, but the actual individuals are uninteresting, sexually?

(that being said, most people just sitting naked on a couch wouldn't do all that much for me either...as there is such a thing as non-sexual nudity too, even for us with sexual attractions - but I digress)

I think you probably get the argument from "sexual" people because...in a lot of people these things are just very much interlinked. While I do intellectually know that a romantic relationship =/= a sexual relationship, for a lot of people (including me) they just often come in the same package. That doesn't take away your frustration with it, I'm sure, but it's an explanation as why you hear the argument so much...

[identity profile] dorknessrising.livejournal.com 2010-12-31 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
So the idea or the act can be arousing, but the actual individuals are uninteresting, sexually?

Exactly. More like the idea of the act, which is what erotica is; the cleaned up, airbrushed, fantasy-enhanced idea of sex where things like leg cramps and backaches don't exist and everyone can achieve a screaming orgasm in under ten minutes. Because actual sex? Right up there with watching my hard drive defrag as "most boring activity ever." But yes, the actual individuals are not sexually appealing in any way to me.

I think you probably get the argument from "sexual" people because...in a lot of people these things are just very much interlinked.

Precisely. And I know that. I just wish when I explained that for me, they are completely separate things because unlike them, I don't experience sexual attraction, that I would stop getting told that I'm either repressing attraction or I'm somehow enjoying porn incorrectly.

(Anonymous) 2010-12-31 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I find the idea of what the performers are doing arousing, but I don't find any of them attractive. As in if they were sitting there naked on my couch, I'd shrug and go back to playing Modern Warfare.

You finally put in words how I've been trying to sum up how I feel and identify when I wasn't even sure myself. I am attracted to a lot of fictional characters, hell I even masturbate once in a blue moon, but more than anything that's just an annoying itch to be scratched, one I wish my body would do without. I have no desire to be with somebody. None at all. :|

It's made life confusing enough as is without the arguments of 'why noooot?' from other people who don't get it.